Volume 7 Issue 1 (2009)
DOI:10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.332
Note: Linguistic Discovery uses Unicode characters
to represent phonetic symbols. Please see Optimizing Display
for requirements to accurately reproduce this page.
Aspects of Northern Mao (Bambassi-Diddesa) Phonology
Michael Ahland
University of Oregon and SIL International
1. Introduction
Northern Mao, also known by the toponyms Bambassi and
Diddesa, is one of the least documented Omotic languages (Bender 2000:180). A
Mao language of the Omotic family, a subclass of the Afroasiatic phylum (Bender
1985; 2000; 2003; Hayward 2000), the language is spoken by an estimated 5,000
speakers (Siebert et al. 1993) living primarily in the areas around Bambassi
town, especially the areas known as Muts’a and Muts’a Mado, as well
as in the Dimt’u area of the Diddesa Valley in western Ethiopia (Siebert
et al. 1994:9; Bender 2003). A small community of speakers may also be found
outside the Mao area proper, in the town of Asosa. Northern Mao speakers refer
to their own language with the autonym /mawes aats’ tose/ MH↓MLL
which may be translated literally as ‘Mao-person-tooth-talk’. The
self-name for the people themselves is /maweswole/ MH↓MM
‘Mao-person-PL’. Most neighboring groups and official Ethiopian
documents such as census reports simply refer to the Northern Mao and other Mao
groups as [ma
ʔo] without distinguishing
among them. A complicating factor is that the name may be used to refer to at
least two non-Omotic languages. The recent determination of the Mao Special
Woreda (a small political designation on the level of a county in the U.S.)
includes speakers of the Kwama (Nilo-Saharan) language within its borders. Kwama
speakers may be found outside the towns of Zebshir and S’uru as well as
further to the west, presumably across the border into Sudan. Speakers of Komo,
another Nilo-Saharan language, are also frequently called Mao. This group may be
found to the south of Kwama, also along the Sudan-Ethiopia border area.
The Omotic-Mao languages, all of which are closely related to Northern
Mao (Bender 2003), are Hozo and Sezo (which, according to the author’s
consultants, are spoken south of Bambassi around Begi town in Kash Mando and
Bangga Tarku k’ebeles, an administrative district below the level of
woreda) and Ganza (which is spoken in the area west of Bambassi town in Boshima,
Shiyo and Bergush k’ebeles). Intelligibility between Northern Mao and
these languages is not high enough to allow for communication between them
without the use of languages of wider communication, most typically Oromo or
Amharic. This is based upon the author’s observations while working in the
area as well as reports by speakers. Bender also notes that Northern Mao is not
mutually intelligible with Hozo-Sezo (1975:128). It remains to be seen what
degree of intelligibility exists between the Hozo and Sezo varieties; they are
widely considered to be different languages by their speakers.
Previously, the available data on Northern Mao have included wordlists
of a few hundred words (Bender 1985, 1990, 2000, 2003; Fleming 1986; Grottanelli
1940; Siebert et al. 1993), a three-page phonological sketch (Wedekind and
Wedekind 1993) and a set of morphological paradigms (Bender 2003). Baye Yimam
has published the most comprehensive sketch of Northern Mao phonology,
morphology and syntax to date (2006). The phonology portion of Baye’s work
was based on approximately 250 words.
Issues of more general typological interest in the Northern Mao
phonological system include the phenomenon of sibilant harmony which exhibits
itself both as a root constraint word-internally as well as a harmony system
across morpheme boundaries, vowel harmony, contrastive vowel length, a set of
four ejectives including the areally rare /p’/and a tone system with
three contrastive heights. In terms of Omotic studies, this work provides the
first in-depth look at the phonology of Northern Mao and thus, the first study
based on a large set of data (over 3,000 words and phrases) on any of the
languages of the Mao subgroup, certainly the least-studied of the three branches
of the Omotic family (Bender 2000:180). Given that Mao is the least-studied
subgroup within Omotic and that Omotic itself is the least studied member of the
Afroasiatic family (Bender 1990:584; Hayward 2000), work on any of the Mao
languages is of interest. Previously, it was not possible for historical
reconstructive work to include input from large sets of data of any of the Mao
languages (Bender 2000, 2003; Hayward 1988, 2000); it is likely that some of the
reconstructions will either be bolstered or perhaps need to be reconsidered in
light of new findings.
The data contained in this description are the result of roughly twenty
months of field work in Ethiopia. Twenty-five speakers of Northern Mao have
participated in this study by providing lists of words, elicited sentences and
more than 8 hours of natural texts. Only those speakers who live and work within
the language areas and who speak Northern Mao as a mother tongue were consulted
in an attempt to lessen the effect of loss or contact with other languages. It
should be noted that the language of wider communication within the Benishangul
Gumuz region is West-Central Oromo while the language of government and official
business is Amharic. There is also a great deal of influence from Arabic due
partly to the close proximity of the Sudan border and partly to the fact that
the vast majority of the Northern Mao in the Bambassi area identify themselves
as Muslims and value Arabic highly. There is little to no influence of Arabic in
the Diddesa area, where West-Central Oromo (primarily) and Amharic (secondarily)
serve as languages of wider communication.
This work, detailing results of
research[1]
undertaken in the
Bambassi, Diddesa and Asosa areas of Ethiopia, is limited in scope to an
examination of the contrastive features of the phonological system as well as
word-internal constraints. The discussion includes inventories of contrastive
consonants, contrastive vowels, an examination of the vowel space, contrastive
vowel length, vowel harmony in roots, syllable patterns, sibilant harmony, and
an inventory of surface tonal melodies in nouns and verbs in citation
form.
2. Consonants
There has been some discussion in the literature regarding
the inventory of contrastive consonants. While Wedekind and Wedekind
(1993:11-13) have provided a brief sketch of various aspects of Northern Mao
phonology and posit 23 consonants, Bender (2000:182) lists 24 with significant
differences. Bender posits a set of voiced plosives, whereas Wedekind and
Wedekind suggest these are in an allophonic relationship with the voiceless
series. Wedekind and Wedekind report the existence of an alveolar implosive /retroflex, as well as a voiced post-alveolar affricate and a palatal nasal, all
of which Bender notes as lacking in his data. Baye adds to the discussion,
claiming the existence of the voiced post-alveolar
[ʒ] (2006:168), which is usually found to be
in complementary distribution with other consonants within Omotic, as is the
case of
[ʒ]~[dʒ]
in Koyra (Hayward 1988:273).
2.1. Phonemic
Consonants
Table 1 exhibits the full inventory of contrastive
consonants found in Northern Mao. As noted in the introduction, these data are
based on a collection of more than 3,000 words and phrases, as well as thirty
fully interlinearized texts. There are a total of 22 contrastive consonants. The
voiced plosives are indeed contrastive, as Bender suggested. While there is an
alveolar implosive, its distribution is predictable relative to the ejective
/t’/, as discussed below. The presence of the affricates is limited: only
a single example of the voiceless post-alveolar affricate has been found in the
entire set of data and this is in free variation with the
/ʃ/ across the speech community; the voiced
counterpart [dʒ] is more frequent, though
limited entirely to borrowed words, mainly from Arabic and is thus not included
in the chart below. The ejective post-alveolar affricate is also limited to
borrowed words and is not included in Table 1. The palatal nasal is predictable
in relation to the alveolar, which is far more frequent, as noted in the
discussion below, section 2.5.2.
|
|
Bilabial
|
Alveolar
|
Post-Alveolar /Palatal
|
Velar
|
Glottal
|
Plosives
|
|
p b
|
t d
|
|
k g
|
|
|
Glottalized
|
p’
|
t’
|
|
k’
|
|
Fricatives
|
|
|
s z
|
ʃ
|
|
h
|
Affricates
|
|
|
|
(tʃ)
|
|
|
|
Glottalized
|
|
ts’
|
|
|
|
Laterals
|
|
|
l
|
|
|
|
Taps
|
|
|
r
|
|
|
|
Nasals
|
|
m
|
n
|
|
ŋ
|
|
Approximants
|
|
w
|
|
j
|
|
|
Table 1: Contrastive Consonant
Inventory
The data in Appendix A provide evidence of contrast between each of the
consonants and their most
phonetically similar counterparts. Since long vowels in monomorphemic words
carry only a single level tone, only one tone is indicated per long vowel. These
tones are represented by the letters H, M or
L.[2]
2.2. Suspect Consonants and
Those Limited to Borrowed Words
As noted above, only a single example of the affricate
/tʃ/ has been found in non-borrowed words.
This is found in the far-distal demonstrative
/gjet
ʃe/ HH ‘that’. It is quite
clear that this affricate has today merged with the
/ʃ/ for the most part. Some speakers still
produce it consistently in this one word while others alternate between the
affricate and the fricative. As a result, the consonant is listed in parentheses
in the consonant chart in Table 1. The other examples of post-alveolar
affricates (either voiced or glottalized) are found exclusively in borrowed
words:
(1)
|
/k’urtʃ’
maŋk’e/
|
H MM
|
‘leprosy’, lit. ‘cutting disease’ (perhaps from
‘cut’ in Amharic)
|
(2)
|
/dʒaːnibe/
|
LHH
|
‘hell’ (from Arabic)
|
(3)
|
/aldʒaːbe/
|
LHL
|
‘charm; amulet’ (from Arabic)
|
Bender reports the existence of /ts/ and /dz/ in Northern Mao
(2003:305). Only the ejective /ts’/ is attested as contrastive according
to this author’s data. In the forms where Bender reports [dz], this author
finds /z/ in the speech of most speakers: in words for ‘dig’ /hakwinza/ MHM and ‘hit’ /haheza/ MHM. Two of the speakers consulted do exhibit the alternative [dz] in
‘hit’, though not in ‘dig.’ Since this is the only
instance of this phone found thus far, and since [dz] is not found initially,
the interpretation as a sequence is preferable. No example of the
non-glottalized [ts] has been
found.[3]
In terms of borrowed words, Arabic loans are found throughout the speech
of those living in and around Bambassi (most typically related to names for
clothing as well as religious terminology) but are not found in the speech of
those speakers living in the Diddesa valley. It seems likely that the Arabic
loans found in Bambassi were borrowed after the emigration to Diddesa, which is
said to have occurred an estimated 60 years ago (Siebert et al. 1994:9).
2.3. Free Variation within /p/:
[p], [f] and
[
ɸ]
The phoneme /p/exhibits variation between the phones [p],
[f] and [ɸ], found in every environment,
initial, medial and final (final is only attested in connected speech and is
thus not utterance final).
This variation is optional, and in many words all three variants are
recognizable to speakers as the same
sound,
[4]
represented in this paper
with /p/, undoubtedly the historical source (Fleming 1986; Bender 2003). Some
speakers show signs of a split, where [f] is produced without variation in a
small number of lexical items, as in /aːpe/ HH ‘eye’, but this is not yet spread widely throughout the
community of speakers.
Fleming (1986:38) notes a ‘small tendency’ for /p/to be
expressed as its allophone [f], noted in both the Bambassi-Diddesa and Sezo
varieties. Fleming reconstructs *p which is attested in other so-called Mao
varieties (including Hozoid and Sezoid) but does not reconstruct the innovative
[f] (1986). In Northern Mao today, the variation is most frequent
intervocalically but, as noted above, is attested in all enviroments, in both
the Bambassi and Diddesa varieties of Northern Mao.
Baye suggests that labial stops /p/ and /b/ are weakened (spirantized)
in intervocalic environments (2006:173). While the spirantization of /b/must be
a feature of the speech of some (according to Baye’s findings), it is not
indicative of the entire community. The spirantized /b/, as a voiced bilabial
fricative, is not attested in the data in this study, nor was it found when
Baye’s data were re-elicited from this author’s Northern Mao
consultants. The database used in this study yields the following results: 1)
only the voiceless labial stop appears to weaken, exhibiting the fricatives
[ɸ] or [f]; 2) spirantization of [p] is also
attested in both initial and final environments; and 3) the relationship is best
characterized as variation and not complementary distribution, as the process is
not obligatory and is not found to be consistent within the speech of even a
single speaker (among those consulted), much less the community.
This variation of [p], [f] and [ɸ]
is found elsewhere in Omotic, as well. Rapold notes that in Benchnon, /p/may be
expressed as [p], [f] or [ɸ] in any
environment (2006:73) and notes that the process appears to be optional.
Variation between [f] and [ɸ] is noted in
Dizin (Beachy 2005:26).
2.4. Glottal Stop
Epenthesis
The glottal stop is predictable under a strictly phonemic
analysis, as an onset to all vowels which exhibit no other onset, and is thus
considered epenthetic. Unambiguous syllable patterns in Northern Mao show CV and
CVC types (section 4). Where an onset is not already filled, a glottal stop is
realized:
(7)
|
/ese/ [ʔɛ.sɛ]
|
ML
|
‘person’
|
epenthesis to fill onset in nominal root
|
(8)
|
/ha-iʃ-a/ [ha.ʔiʃ.a]
|
MMH
|
‘drank’
|
epenthesis to fill onset in verbal root
|
(9)
|
/maw-ese/ [ma.wɛ.sɛ]
|
LHL
|
‘Mao person’
|
onset provided by first word in compound
|
(10)
|
/ham-iʃ-a/ [ha.mi.ʃa]
|
MMH
|
‘we drank’
|
onset provided by prefix
|
In both (7) and (8), the glottal stop is inserted to meet an
onset requirement; in (9), the first word in the compound, /maw/ L
‘Mao’, provides the onset for /ese/ [ʔɛ.sɛ]
ML ‘person’. Likewise in (10), an onset is provided by the 1PL
prefix /ham-/. Some speakers occasionally maintain the glottal stop in very slow
careful speech as an onset to verb roots, even when an onset is provided. This
has not been attested in nouns (as in example (9)). But no speaker consulted has
exhibited this maintenance of the glottal in verb roots consistently, even in
hyperarticulated speech. The analysis of the glottal stop as an epenthetic
consonant finds further support in that the glottal stop is severely limited in
its distribution, only occurring word-initially in monomorphemic words and word-
or root-initially in verbs carrying a vowel-final prefix. The other glottal
consonant, /h/, on the other hand, may be found word-initially and
intervocalically[5]
in monomorphemic
words and is considered a phoneme.
The /ha-/ prefix, as seen in (8) above, has been tentatively considered
a declarative prefix on the basis of its distribution. The form is optionally
found in declarative realis and irrealis verb forms as well as in polar/yes-no
questions (most consistently those where the expected answer is affirmative).
The prefix is obligatorily prohibited in negatives, content-interrogatives,
imperatives and optatives/jussives.
2.5. Complementary
Distribution
The major phonological processes which may be observed in
Northern Mao include voicing assimilation (both voicing and devoicing),
deglottalization (loss of glottalized release of stops), gemination of stops
produced at the same point of articulation and nasal assimilation. Each is
discussed below. The post-alveolar groove fricative
[ʒ], which Baye reports and lists within his
chart of contrastive consonants of Northern Mao (2006:168), must be considered
an allophone of /ʃ/: Baye’s data
include [biža] ‘be present’ (2006:194) and [kažäya]
‘baboon’ (2006:221). This author has found
[biʃa] /habiʃa/ HM ‘be present’ (the non-past existential) and
[kaːʃajɛ] /kaːʃaje/ LHL ‘baboon’, respectively. No speaker with whom this author has
consulted produces the [ʒ] form in the same
words; rather each instance is pronounced as
[ʃ]. In less-careful, fast speech however,
the voiced variant has been found in these intervocalic environments, in these
words.
The alveolar ejective /t’/ exhibits a voiced implosive allophone
[ɗ] intervocalically. Fleming notes this
phenomenon, only for Northern Mao (1986:40).
In (11), the /t’/is found in the intervocalic position before the
final nominal ending [-ɛ] /-e/ while in
(12), the [t’] is found in the less sonorant environment, preceding the
[k] (in connected speech, final vowels of nouns are not pronounced and are
limited to utterance-final and citation form
environments).
[6]
The phenomenon is
also noted root-internally, as in /kit’iʃe/ MLL ‘neck’ which, apart from very slow, careful speech, is
pronounced [kɨɗɨʃɛ] MLL.
In agreement with Fleming, Wedekind and Wedekind (1993:11) also report
the existence of the alveolar implosive in the Bambassi variety. This
author’s research shows that the phenomenon is found in both Bambassi and
Diddesa varieties and the relationship between the ejective and the implosive
may even be seen in loanwords such as the toponym Diddesa [ɗɨɗɛsa]
which in very slow careful speech is pronounced
[t’ɨt’ɛsa]
as well as
[t’ɨɗɛsa]
by speakers from each area, where even the initial implosive, which is
not normally found in Mao words, is reanalyzed as an ejective.
Wedekind and Wedekind suggest the implosive is retroflexed (1993).
Greenberg writes, “A recurrent feature of injectives [implosives] which
deserves special mention and treatment is that the injective corresponding to a
noninjective dental is often retracted to the alveolar or alveopalatal position
and is consistently apical, often with accompanying retroflexion”
(1970:129). He continues, noting that these retroflexed implosives are quite
common, “The examples in the sample were so numerous that this property
can be considered normal and one may suspect that it is present in some
instances without being noted in the phonetic description” (1970:129).
Greenberg’s observations were supported by Haudricourt’s earlier
work (1950), where it was suggested that “the tendency towards
retroflexion and retraction in apical injectives...could...be attributed to the
rarefication of the air in the supraglottal cavity caused by the descending
larynx. While it is not clear that the pressure difference is substantial enough
to cause this (Greenberg 1970:139), it is important to note that several
researchers have remarked on the frequency of the retroflex implosives which are
formed posterior to the dental region.
While no palatography or linguagraphy which could aid in identifying
both passive and active articulators has yet been attempted on the Northern Mao
data, it is possible to note that the implosive does appear to be produced with
the tongue tip slightly posterior to the alveolar ejective, in the post-alveolar
region. However, retroflexion does not appear to be involved and is not observed
in perturbations of the third formants of surrounding vowels, as can be seen in
Figures 1 and 2, below.
Figure 1: Wave and Spectrogram for
[kjaɗɛ]
ML
‘house’
Figure 2: Wave and Spectrogram for
[koɗ-ɛs ɛsɛ]
LH
↓ML ‘have-NEG.REL person’
In each case, there is no appreciable drop in the third
formant which could indicate retroflexion.
2.5.1. Stop
Sequences
When voiced stops immediately precede voiceless stops,
forming a sequence, the first stop devoices, assimilating to the following stop.
Consider the following examples where the final consonants of the verb root
devoice before the relativizer /-te/:
Alternatively, some speakers tend to epenthesize the /i/before the relativizer /-t/when it immediately follows another stop. The result
in this instance is that the first stop is not devoiced.
In Northern Mao, if a glottalized consonant (ejective) is immediately
followed by a non-glottalized stop, the first consonant loses its glottalized
release and is pronounced as an unreleased oral stop at the same point of
articulation—a case of assimilation in manner.
In the first instance, the ejective [k’] of /ak’e/ MM ‘grain/corn’ is unreleased when the [k’] immediately
precedes the [t] of ‘harvest’, /ha-tul-a/ MHM. The /ha-/declarative marker, which is generally included in the citation
forms[8]
of verbs in Northern Mao, is
not always obligatory. It is the lack of this declarative prefix that allows the
final consonant of the noun to become adjacent to the initial consonant of the
verb root. For an additional example, see ‘harvest time’ (19) below.
In (16) above, the verb ‘see’ is relativized with the /-te/relativizer. The result is a geminate (phonetically lengthened)
[tː] without a glottalized release.
This process of loss of glottalized release is part of a more general
phenomenon in Northern Mao, where initial stops in a sequence of two are
generally unreleased. Of course, the involvement of loss of glottalized release
is more interesting because it leads to neutralization between the ejective and
oral stops in this environment. As might be expected, in CC sequences where the
final C is a glottalized stop, the release of the stop is maintained and no
neutralization is observed, as in the example ‘nephew’ (20) below.
This is likely due to the fact that the consonant’s release is before a
vowel and not hampered by any following consonant.
As has already been seen in the data above (16), stops which are
produced at the same point of articulation and which are found in sequence form
a lengthened stop. Of course, these processes which involve the lack of release
of the first stop in a sequence of stops, the loss of glottalization of the
first stop in a stop sequence, and voicing assimilation of the first stop in a
sequence actually allow for the sequence to be produced as a single long stop.
Gemination is only attested across morpheme boundaries and is best understood as
epiphenomenal to the processes above, which leave no alternative for phonetic
production of stops in sequence when they are produced at the same point of
articulation. Additional examples of this heteromorphemic gemination are
provided below:
(17)
|
/oʃke/
|
ML
|
+
|
/gombole/
|
HHH
|
>
|
[ʔoʃgːombolɛ]
|
MMMM
|
|
‘meat’
|
|
|
‘mortar’
|
|
|
‘meat mortar’
|
|
(20)
|
/obe
/
|
HL
|
+
|
/p’iʃe
/
|
MM
|
>
|
[
ʔopː’iʃɛ]
|
HML
|
|
‘brother’
|
|
|
‘child’
|
|
|
‘nephew’ (‘brother’s child’)
|
While voiceless stops which are immediately followed by
voiced stops do not typically undergo voicing, the voiceless /voiced stop
sequence in example (17) forms a long stop which begins with a period of
voicelessness and is followed by 30 ms of prevoicing before its release into the
following vowel. Due to the lack of release of the first stop and the presence
of prevoicing, the series may be perceived as
[gː] and is transcribed as such here. The
waveform and spectrogram is provided in Figure 3. Figure 4 highlights the
[ʃgːo]
sequence from the same file, showing the prevoicing before the release of the
stop.
Figure 3: Waveform and Spectrogram for
[ʔoʃgːombolɛ]
MMMM ‘meat mortar’
Figure 4: Waveform and
Spectrogram for [ʃgːo]
sequence
2.5.2. Nasal
Assimilation
While the bilabial nasal [m] and the alveolar nasal [n]
occur initially, intervocalically and
root-finally,[9]
the [m] shows no
indication of involvement in assimilation and may be found preceding alveolar or
velar consonants. The alveolar nasal [n], on the other hand, when preceding a
consonant, is found only before alveolars, [t, t’, d, s, ts’, z],
exhibiting assimilation to the place of the following consonant. The velar nasal
[ŋ] occurs intervocalically and root-finally; before consonants, it
exhibits assimilation to the following consonant, preceding only the velars [k,
k’, g].
The presence of a palatal nasal was reported by Wedekind and Wedekind
(1993:21):
[nú:nɪɲɑ̀]
‘how?’. The data gathered for this study show
[nu:nɨɲa] /nu:nin-ja/ HLL ‘how is it?’, where
the root [nu:nɛ:] HL is the interrogative
‘how?’ followed by /-ja/, a bound copula found on most
interrogatives and employed in stative verb derivations. The /-ja /suffix whose
presence triggered the assimilation which led to the root’s final nasal
becoming palatalized also carries the low tone of the /-a/ L question marker
(some speakers lengthen the [a] vowel of the copula while others do not). This
same copula is found to the right of other interrogatives pronouns: /komis-ja/ HHL ‘what?’, /naːt-ja/ HL ‘when?’, /hindet-ja/ MHL‘where?’. The only other instance of a palatal nasal in Wedekind
and Wedekind’s wordlist is in the word
[hàɸɑ́ːɲá]
‘swim’ (1993:25). But when checked carefully with various
speakers, the nasal is velar, not palatal: /hapaːŋa/ MMH ‘swim’. Bender also notes that the nasal in ‘swim’
is a velar (2003:307). This author has found no data to suggest the existence of
a contrastive palatal nasal.
2.6. Sibilant
Harmony
Northern Mao, in contrast to some other Omotic languages,
exhibits a smaller inventory of sibilant consonants. Hayward has suggested that
Proto-Omotic likely had *s, *z, *ts’,
*ʃ, *ʒ,
*tʃ’,
*ʂ , *ʐ
, *ɕ’ in initial position and an
additional three *ts, *tʃ,
*ɕ, in non-initial positions (1988: 292). In
Northern Mao, only the following sibilants are contrastive and attested apart
from loanwords: /s, z, ts’,
ʃ,
tʃ/; of course, both
[tʃ’] and
[dʒ] may be added to this inventory, when
loanwords are considered. As noted above,
[ʒ] is only attested occasionally, as a
voiced variant of /ʃ/.
It is well-known that sibilants within roots in Omotic languages tend to
agree in terms of place of articulation. Hayward writes, “There is, in
fact, in many languages a very strictly observed co-occurrence constraint or
morpheme structure condition for roots, to the effect that co-occurring
sibilants must agree with respect to palatality” (1988:287). This claim
obtains for Northern Mao. Within roots, without respect to airstream mechanism,
sibilants are found only at the same place of articulation. Tables 2 and 3
provide evidence, below. There are no counterexamples where sibilants of
different places of articulation may be found in the same root except in the
loanword /ʃemize/ LHH ‘shirt’. It should be noted, however, that due to the
weak attestation of /z/, no word containing the voiced alveolar sibilant and any
other sibilant has been found—apart from this loanword, where the expected
harmony does not apply. Roots containing palatal sibilants are provided in Table
2 while those containing alveolar sibilants are featured in Table 3.
/ʃeːʃe
/ MM
|
‘urine’
|
/ʃaʃe
/ HL
|
‘tendon; vein’
|
/ʃaːʃe
/ MH
|
‘ade ababa flower’
(yellow)
|
/ʃuːʃe
/ HH
|
‘spitting’
|
/ʃoːʃe
/ HH
|
‘snake’
|
Table 2: Sample Roots with Palatal
Sibilants
Table 3: Sample Roots with Alveolar
Sibilants
This phenomenon of sibilant harmony does not extend to suffixes
regularly in Northern Mao. At times, in the texts collected thus far, there is
some evidence that this optionally occurs in fast, connected speech: /diʃ-es
maŋk’e/ LH↓MM be.known-NEG.REL sickness
‘unknown disease’ sometimes pronounced
[diʃ-eʃ maŋk’ɛ], where
the negative relative clause marker
/-ese/ HL
undergoes harmony with the root. This is also seen in [t’oʃ-eʃ
k’ɛts’ɛ] HH↓MM sprout-NEG.REL land ‘barren
land’. The /-ese/ negative relative clause marker is unaffected when
following roots without palatals: [ʔeːŋ
koɗ-ɛs ɛsɛ] MMH
↓ML[10]
heart have-NEG.REL person ‘one who doesn’t have heart’ (i.e.
‘coward’).
This phenomenon where sibilants in suffixes agree with the place of
articulation of sibliants in roots appears only to be a tendency with exceptions
existing, particularly in careful speech. Rapold has found a similar phenomenon,
though more frequent in Benchnon, which does exhibit sibiliant harmony (where a
more elaborate harmony system is attested with marked sibilants imposing on less
marked, requiring harmonization) where sibilants in suffixes harmonize with root
sibilants only optionally and not in slow, careful speech (2006:67).
Certainly, it is clear that in Northern Mao, the nominative case marker
/-iʃ/does not exhibit any harmony with
sibilants in the root noun, as in the following examples: [soːnts’-iʃ]
ML ‘child-NOM’
and
[ɛs-iʃ]
ML ‘person-NOM’. It may be that, as Rapold has found in
Benchnon, markedness plays a role where roots with more
marked
[11]
sibilants,
such as palatal sibilants, impose upon less marked sibilants in suffixes
(2006:67). That is, in Benchnon, sibilants in roots are preserved and do not
agree with marked sibilants in suffixes nor do the more marked palatal sibilants
in suffixes agree with non-palatal sibilants in roots. The smaller inventory of
sibilants in Northern Mao may obscure this phenomenon, as sibilants are found
only at the alveolar and palatal places of articulation. There are no
alveo-palatal sibilants (as in Benchnon), and the post-alveolar
/tʃ/is found in only one word, thus far.
3. Phonemic
Vowels
Northern Mao has a five vowel system, each of which also
exhibits a long counterpart: /i, e, a, o/ and /u/. Examples of length contrast
are attested throughout the five-vowel inventory: /int’e/ HH ‘seeing’ and /iːnt’e/ HL‘grunt’; /jeʃe/ HH ‘near-distal demonstrative’ and /jeːʃe/ HH ‘honey’; /ape/ ML ‘maternal uncle’ and /aːpe/ HH ‘eye’; /t’uʃe/ LL ‘strapping’ and /t’uːʃe/ HH ‘a meeting’; /t’oʃe/ HH ‘sprouting’ and /t’oːʃe/ MH ‘vomit’.
|
Front
|
Central
|
Back
|
High
|
i, iː
|
|
u, uː
|
Mid
|
e, eː
|
|
o, oː
|
Low
|
|
a, aː
|
|
Table 4: Contrastive Vowel Inventory
The citation form of all nouns includes the post-thematic vowel /-e/,
which never exhibits contrastive length. Duration and fundamental frequency
measurements of 50 words with short vowels and 50 words with long vowels show
that long vowels are 1.5 to 2 times the length of short vowels. It is also clear
that pitch does not necessarily rise with increased length; pitch and vowel
length are wholly independent phenomena in Northern Mao.
Evidence of contrast between each of the five vowel qualities is
provided in Appendix B, including examples of both short and long counterparts
for each quality (except /i/vs. /a/and /u/vs. /a/, since it is assumed that
these are too distant from one another to be in any likely relationship).
3.1. Vowel
Quality
In order to describe the vowel space most accurately,
measurements of the first and second formants, which show the actual place of
articulation of vowels acoustically, of ten words featuring each short vowel and
each long vowel have been
completed.
[12]
This F2 x F1
examination of vowel space provides a more detailed account of the vowel target
and variation within space than can be conveyed by IPA transcription alone. The
measurement of the formant was made at the vowel mid-point to lessen the effect
of consonant perturbation. The full set of words used in the study, along with
each measurement, is found in Appendix C. These measurements provide the actual
vowel qualities produced by speakers without relying on the transcriber’s
ability to determine vowel status—a phenomenon that becomes difficult as
the articulatory space for vowels is difficult to gauge between languages and
even between speakers with different vocal tract lengths.
Figure 5 shows the vowel space derived from acoustic measurement of the
first and second formant midpoints of short medial vowels in 50 Northern Mao
words.
Figure 5: Plot-Chart for Short Vowels
In general, an expected V shape is visible for the
five-vowel inventory in Northern Mao as is seen in other five-vowel systems
(Ladefoged 2001:35,42). The ranges of the formants in Hz and length in ms are
provided in Table 5.
|
F1
|
Mean F1
|
F2
|
Mean F2
|
ms
|
Mean ms
|
i
|
341-434
|
388
|
1419-2335
|
2109
|
60-94
|
76
|
e
|
458-639
|
539
|
1560-2006
|
1864
|
72-113
|
97
|
u
|
376-478
|
419
|
759-1217
|
925
|
61-106
|
88
|
o
|
497-621
|
551
|
959-1385
|
1136
|
63-114
|
91
|
a
|
671-791
|
741
|
1405-1761
|
1644
|
71-109
|
89
|
Table 5: Ranges and Means for Formant and Length
Measurements–Short Vowels
Figure 6 provides the formant chart for the long vowels. For the most
part, the vowel space is quite similar to that of the short vowels, showing a
lack of other vocalic phenomena such as ATR contrast.
Figure 6: Plot-Chart for Long
Vowels
Again, the ranges of formants for the long vowels as well as the length
in ms are provided in Table 6.
|
F1
|
Mean F1
|
F2
|
Mean F2
|
ms
|
Mean ms
|
iː
|
308-458
|
373
|
1290-2317
|
2151
|
119-216
|
152
|
eː
|
481-673
|
559
|
1850-2062
|
1989
|
144-208
|
182
|
uː
|
372-450
|
405
|
796-1136
|
981
|
169-204
|
186
|
oː
|
418-606
|
511
|
900-1164
|
1027
|
136-190
|
165
|
aː
|
579-856
|
782
|
1495-1636
|
1567
|
140-193
|
170
|
Table 6: Ranges and Means for Formant and Length
Measurements–Long Vowels
In Table 5, the average length of short vowels is 88ms while the average
length of long vowels in Table 6 is 171ms, a significant difference to be sure.
The long high vowels /iː/ and
/uː/ are: twice the length of their short
counterparts, while the long vowels /eː/,
/oː/ and
/aː/ are well over 1.5 times the length of
their corresponding short vowels.
As can be seen in the ranges and means of Tables 5 and 6, the
long
/eː/ vowels tend to be a bit higher and
more to the front of the oral cavity than their short /e/ counterparts. As a
result the short /e/ vowels tend to be phonetically closer to
[ɛ]
than
[e] and are transcribed as such when
phonetic brackets are used in this work. Baye 2006 transcribes these short
vowels with the [ä], the Ethiopianist symbol which corresponds to the
I.P.A.’s [ɛ].
At times, the short vowel /e/may be realized phonetically as [e],
especially in the environment of post-alveolar/palatal sounds (as seen in [diʃ-eʃ
maŋk’ɛ] LH↓MM be.known-NEG.REL sickness
‘unknown disease’ and [t’oʃ-eʃ
k’ɛts’ɛ] HH↓MM sprout-NEG.REL land
‘barren land’, repeated here from section 2.6 above). Since the long
[eː] and short
[ɛ] vowels correspond to the same
phonological space (despite some phonetic differences) within the larger
Northern Mao vocalic system, they are represented with the
/eː/ and /e/ phonologically. The slight
differences in formant means between the short and long /e/ vowel and to a
lesser extent, the short and long /o/ vowel, may be due to the increased amount
of time in lengthened articulation, allowing speakers to more consistently reach
the articulatory target and produce less-centralized vowels.
Some speakers exhibit an assimilatory process where the final
post-thematic /-e/ vowel, which is found marking all nominals, may become [a]
when the nominal root contains an /a/ vowel. This is not attested consistently
throughout the entire speech community but is observable in the speech of some,
where /kawe/ LL ‘top; upwards’ and /kaːwe/ LL
‘griddle’ may be alternatively pronounced as
[kawɛ]~[kawa]
LL and
[kaːwɛ]~[kaːwa]
LL respectively.
3.2. Deletion of Final Vowels
in Connected Speech
The final vowels of nouns and other word-categories are lost
in connected speech. For nouns, the citation form ends with the /-e/vowel,
whether the noun is derived from a verb or not. That is, verbal nouns like the
infinitive and non-derived prototypical nouns are marked the same. This final
/-e/ vowel is lost in connected speech unless the word is positioned at the end
of an utterance. This phenomenon may be seen in various examples which are
provided above (6, 12, 15, 16, 19) and (20). In the case of (6), the citation
form of the noun /ape/ ML ‘maternal uncle’ is not provided and is
thus provided here for the sake of demonstrating the loss of the final /-e/vowel in connected speech. Other word-categories, including for instance,
adverbs of time and a special category of relator nouns, which today show signs
of grammaticalization as new postpositions, also lose their final vowels ([e],
[o] or [a]) in connected speech, showing the phenomenon to be phonologically
rather than morphophonologically motivated.
Baye first noted the loss of these final vowels and suggested that the
loss of final vowels on nouns could be due to the incorporation of
‘non-head’ nouns into larger syntactic units with their syntactic
‘heads’, forming a ‘phonological unit’ (2006:176). The
text corpus used in this study, however shows that head nouns in complex noun
phrases, pronouns, which are themselves syntactic noun phrases, and single
nouns, which make up a simple noun phrase, drop the final /-e/ vowel in
connected speech and need not be seen as phonologically nor syntactically bound
to the many elements which may follow. In texts, some speakers produce the final
/-e/on nominals before pauses, but this is not consistent throughout the speech
community; when nominals are found at the ends of sentences, they always carry
the /-e/ vowel.
3.3. Epenthesis of the Vowel
[i]
The epenthetic vowel in Northern Mao is the high front [i].
This may be found before the relativizer /-te/on erstwhile verbs such as [geːts’-it
ɛsɛ] LH ↓ ML ‘person who is beautiful’, from the
verb /ha-geːts’-a/ MLH ‘be beautiful’ and [nok-it
munts’ɛ] HH LL ‘woman who is good’ from the verb /ha-nok-a/ MMH ‘be good’. Verbs whose roots end in an approximant, do not
exhibit the epenthetic [i]: /ha-kaːw-a/ MMH ‘be white’ > [kaːw-t
waːrɛ] H ↓ ML ‘clothes that are white’, nor do
verbs whose roots end in a vowel: /ha-ki-a/ MH-M
[13]
‘come’ > [ki-t
ɛsɛ] MML ‘person who came’. As expected, the vowel [i]
is not lengthened since the requirements for epenthesis are not satisfied. In
some instances, this epenthetic vowel appears internally within nouns, as in
/kog
ʃe/ [kokʃɛ]
ML ‘lung’ which may alternatively be pronounced [kogiʃɛ]
MLL. Only in the most careful speech does the /g/maintain its voicing in the
absence of the epenthetic vowel—the same devoicing phenomenon noted in
section 2.6, above.
3.4. Vowel Harmony (a Root
Constraint) in Tri-syllabic Nouns
Tri-syllabic noun roots show vowel place harmony in terms of
backness: /kit’iʃe/ MLL ‘neck’; /iliʃe/ HHL ‘pot’; /ts’ugune/ HLL ‘squirrel’; /ugume/ HLL ‘snail’; /ʃundoːre/ LHH ‘donkey’; /ewete/ HLL ‘eavesdropping’; /t’epile/ HLL ‘patch’; /koloole/ HLH ‘malaria’. Of course, the final post-thematic vowel /-e/, which
marks the citation form for all Northern Mao nouns and is homophonous with the
infinitive marker, does not participate in this root harmony. Thus, there is no
vowel harmony which may be observed in bi-syllabic nouns; each of the five
vowels may co-occur with the final /-e/. While the majority of Northern Mao
nouns are bi-syllabic, there are noun roots which are three syllables (even
seven isolated four-syllable noun roots have been found; see section 5.2.) and
do exhibit an apparent constraint in which either front or back vowels may be
found in roots. Northern Mao exhibits no monosyllabic nouns.
Baye (2006:180) notes the preponderance of bi-syllabic nouns in Northern
Mao and hypothesized that the few tri-syllabic nouns found in his set of 250
words might be loans. The larger corpus gathered for this study has yielded far
more of these tri-syllabic nouns (as well as the four-syllable nouns which are
provided in Table 20, below), suggesting that while these are certainly far
rarer than the bi-syllabic nouns, the tri-syllabic nouns are likely not
borrowed. In these tri-syllabic nouns, unlike the bi-syllabic nouns, all but two
examples of non-borrowed words
[14]
out a set of 146 attest to this root constraint in terms of front-back status of
the root vowels:
[k’ok’iʃɛ]
HHH ‘crust’, and
[koginɛ]
LHH ‘sewing’.
|
Front Vs in Root
|
Back Vs in Root
|
High Vowels
|
/dipile/ HLL ‘hem’
|
/kuʃume/ HLL ‘chin’
|
Mid Vowels
|
/gergeʃe/ LLL ‘wall’
|
/gobole/ HHH ‘window’
|
High and Mid Vowels
|
/ʃek’iʃe/ HHH ‘vervet monkey’
|
/ʃundoːre/ LHH ‘donkey’
|
Table 7: Vowel Harmony in Tri-Syllabic
Nouns
By far the most common sort of harmony is where each of the
root vowels is either /i/or /u/. There are far fewer examples of both root
vowels at the mid aperture. Thus far, for instance, only one root has been found
including the back vowels /o/and /u/, provided in Table 7. Finally, as is
often the case in instances of harmony, the most sonorant, low vowel /a/(in the
case of Northern Mao, a low-central vowel) does not participate in the harmony
system and may be shown to co-occur with each of the other vowels: /alime/ LHL ‘turban’, /hademe/ HLL ‘work’, /k’awone/ MLL ‘dwarf’, and /kaʃuwe/ LHL ‘medicine’. The constraint prevents roots containing both front
vowels and back vowels.
As noted above, two possible exceptions to this tendency have been
found:
[k’ok’iʃɛ]
HHH ‘crust’, and
[koginɛ]
LHH ‘sewing’
. These two
examples may be instances of the epenthetic vowel [i] inserted between
unallowable CC sequences, as noted in the variant pronunciation
of
/kogʃe/[kogiʃɛ]
ML ‘lung’ in section 3.3. It may also be the case that the
examples with both high and mid front vowels in the same root are actually
instances of the epenthetic vowel [i] as well. No examples where /i/precedes
/e/have been found out of 3,000 entries.
There is some corroborating evidence for vowel harmony observed in the
allomorphy of the nominative case marker
/-iʃ/.
When this suffix attaches to front-vowel, /o/-vowel or
/a/-vowel roots, the shape [-iʃ] is found.
However, when the suffix attaches to roots with the /u/-vowel roots, the
allomorph [-uʃ] results. Both height and
backness are required for triggering harmony (the /o/-vowel roots do not trigger
any vowel harmony morphophonologically); this would support the existence of the
roots containing both [o] and [i] vowels (as opposed to the interpretation of
[i] as an epenthetic vowel), in the discussion above.
4. Syllable
Structure
The most common and unambiguous syllable patterns are
provided in Table 8. Phonotactics is discussed in section 4.1., below.
Unambiguous CV Pattern |
Example
|
Gloss
|
CV
|
/po.t’e
/ HL
|
‘thigh; hip’
|
CVC
|
/tal.k’e
/ HL
|
‘headpad’
|
Table 8: Syllable Patterns involving Short
Vowels
As noted in the discussion on consonants, the glottal stop
is epenthesized to meet the requirement of an onset as in the following: / ese/ [ʔɛ.sɛ]
ML ‘person’ and /alde/ [ʔ
al.dɛ]
LH ‘knowledge’. Thus, each of these words exhibits the CV.CV
pattern.
Only three monomorphemic forms exhibiting complex codas (of the pattern
CVNC) have been found out of the entire Northern Mao data
set.[15]
The first consonant in the
complex coda is limited to the nasal /n/which is then followed by either of the
sibilants /ts’/or /s/, where the following onset is either /k/or
/k’/.
Table 9: Limited CVNC Pattern
The long vowels fit within the CVV and CVVC syllable patterns, as seen
in Table 10 below:
Unambiguous CV Pattern |
Example
|
Gloss
|
CVV
|
/beː.ze
/ HL
|
‘broom’
|
CVVC
|
/maːl.t’e
/ ML
|
‘bone’
|
Table 10:Syllable Patterns involving Long
Vowels
The VV pattern is limited to geminate (i.e. identical vowel)
sequences and, despite the addition of vowel length, does not exhibit tonal
contours in monomorphemic words.
4.1.
Phonotactics
Table 11 provides a list of consonants which may be found in
initial, intervocalic and in CC sequences across syllable boundaries in
isolated[16]
monomorphemic words.
Those consonants which are suspect on account of very few attestations (as in
the case of [tʃ]) or their being found only
in borrowed words ([dʒ,
tʃ’]) are included in the distribution
chart. All consonants, except [tʃ,
tʃ’, ŋ] may be found initially.
Of these, only [ŋ] never occurs as a syllable onset; that is, all other
consonants may serve as syllable onsets. However, [r] is found initially only in
borrowed words. There is only one example of the lateral serving as an onset
/luke/ LH ‘curdling’. All consonants except
[dʒ] are found intervocalically.
Within CC sequences across syllable boundaries, the first consonant
(i.e. the coda of the preceding syllable) may not be any of the
following
[p’, t’, k’, h, tʃ,
dʒ, j or w]
. The second consonant in the sequence (i.e. the onset of
the following syllable) may not be any of these:
[tʃ, ŋ, l, r].
|
Initial #_V |
Medial V_V |
Clusters C.C (across syllables) |
Examples
|
p~f
|
+
|
+
|
mp, pk
|
ʃapkowe MHL
‘shoe’
|
b
|
+
|
+
|
mb, nb, rb, lb, bd
|
danbe HH ‘tradition;
culture’
|
t
|
+
|
+
|
lt, rt, nt
|
maːlte ML
‘fat’
|
d
|
+
|
+
|
bd, nd, ld, gd
|
obde HH ‘threshing
floor’
|
k
|
+
|
+
|
pk, rk, sk, lk, ʃk, ŋk, kn
|
piʃke HH
‘whistling’
|
g
|
+
|
+
|
rg, lg, ŋg, gd
|
gergeʃe LLL
‘wall’
|
p’
|
+
|
+
|
mp’
|
amp’its’e LLL
‘bead’
|
t’
|
+
|
+
|
nt’, lt’
|
t’eːnt’e ML
‘worm’
|
k’
|
+
|
+
|
ŋk’, rk’, lk’,
ts’k’
|
burk’e HL ‘spring (of
water)’
|
s
|
+
|
+
|
ms, ns, sk, sm
|
mamsese HHL ‘fair’
|
z
|
+
|
+
|
nz, zn
|
wanzibe MLL ‘fingernail;
claw’
|
ʃ
|
+
|
+
|
nʃ, ʃk
|
oʃke ML
‘meat’
|
h
|
+
|
+
|
--
|
|
ts’
|
+
|
+
|
nts’, mts’,
ts’k’
|
wints’k’e ML ‘father’s
sister (aunt)’
|
tʃ (1 medial ex)
|
-
|
+
|
--
|
|
dʒ (loans only)
|
+
|
-
|
ldʒ
|
aldʒaːbe LHL ‘a charm’
(Arabic)
|
tʃ’ (loans only)
|
-
|
+
|
rtʃ’
|
kurtʃ’e HH ‘cutting’
(Amharic)
|
l
|
+
|
+
|
lb, lt, ld, lk, lg, lt’, lk’, lm,
lj, lw, ldʒ
|
p’elk’e MH ‘study;
research’
|
r
|
+
(loans)
|
+
|
rb, rt, rk, rg, rk’, rn, rm,
rtʃ’
|
p’erk’e HH ‘a lightening
flash’
|
m
|
+
|
+
|
rm, lm, sm, mp, mb, ms, mp’,
mts’
|
k’embile MLL
‘loincloth’
|
n
|
+
|
+
|
rn, zn, kn, nb, nt, nd, nt’, ns, nz,
nʃ, nts’
|
hants’ile MLL ‘slipping;
sliding’
|
ŋ
|
-
|
+
|
ŋg, ŋk,
ŋk’
|
ʃaŋk’e HH ‘front room (of
house)’
|
w
|
+
|
+
|
lw
|
akilwaje MMLL ‘Mao clan
name’
|
j
|
+
|
+
|
lj
|
k’ilje MH
‘leaving’
|
Table 11: Consonant Distribution Chart
4.2. Interpretation of
Labialization and Palatalization
Northern Mao exhibits an ambiguous sequence where certain
obstruents may be followed by either the labio-velar [w] or palatal [j]
approximants, word-initially. Consonants with a following labio-velar
approximant have not been found before the vowels /u/ or /o/ but are attested
before each of the other vowels. The labio-velar approximant has not been
attested following the obstruents [p, b, d, p’, z, h, or ts’]. The
full inventory found thus far is noted in Table 12, along with the number of
times attested and the following vowels.
Consonant
|
Number of times attested
|
Following Vowels
|
tw
|
5
|
i, e, a
|
kw
|
13
|
i, e, a
|
gw
|
3
|
i, a
|
t’w
|
1
|
a
|
k’w
|
9
|
i, e, a
|
ʃw
|
4
|
i, a
|
Table 12: Consonants with Labio-Velar
Approximants
Consonants with a following palatal approximant have not
been attested before the vowels /i/, /o/ or /u/. Word-initially, they are not
found following the obstruents [b, t, d, t’, s, z,
ʃ, h, or ts’]. The full inventory is
noted in Table 13, again with the number of times attested and the vowels which
are found following.
Consonant
|
Number of times attested
|
Following Vowels
|
pj~f
j
|
4
|
a
|
kj
|
6
|
a
|
gj
|
5
|
e, a
|
p’j
|
2
|
a
|
k’j
|
3
|
a
|
Table 13: Consonants with Palatal
Approximants
There are limited instances of these consonant-approximant
sequences found medially: [k’] and [k] may precede [w] while [k] and
[p’] may precede the [j].
These consonant-approximant sequences are ambiguous in that they could
be interpreted as a single C (that is, as a labialized or palatalized
consonant), as a CC cluster, as a consonant followed by a VV sequence with [u]
or [i] as the first vowel, or as a diphthong
[u
̯V] and
[i̯V], formed with the following vowel.
These phenomena are interpreted as CC clusters on the grounds that positing
complex consonants would increase the consonant inventory by 11 and lead to an
inventory which does not follow a principle of economy nor which exhibits
natural class symmetries; that is the sets of labialized and palatalized
consonants would not be found systematically distributed throughout the
inventory. Additional observations, which are perhaps less convincing as
phonological arguments but which are relevant to the consonant-approximant
sequences, include: 1) there are no non-geminate (i.e. non-identical) VV
sequences in monomorphemic words; 2) there is no evidence of diphthongs, and the
distribution of the approximants would require positing five diphthongs; 3) in
the vast majority of cases, they are found word-initially and when they do occur
medially, consonant distribution and syllable structure suggest they must be
seen as onset clusters; it might be expected that were these single Cs, they
could be found more often internally—more generally distributed. All
unambiguous Cs which occur initially also occur as medial onsets, apart from
[dʒ], which occurs only in borrowed
words.
In short, as all analyses are problematic, it is preferable to minimize
the consonant inventory rather than complicate it in a nonsymmetrical,
nonsystematic manner. It is the assumption of the author that more data may
yield other examples of these CC clusters, where additional obstruents may be
followed by either of the approximants.
It is worth noting that Rapold finds a somewhat similar situation, at
least with regards to the palatalized
consonants,
[17]
in Benchnon
(Gimira-Omotic) (2006), where “all four analytical possibilities”
are considered and found to be problematic (2006:102). Ultimately, a CC cluster
analysis is also chosen. In general, labialized and palatalized consonants are
not included in the inventory of contrastive consonants in Omotic languages, as
is the case in
Benchnon (Rapold 2006) in particular, as well as in
Maale (Azeb 2001),
Dizin (Beachy 2005), a wide variety of
languages and reconstructed Proto-Languages (Bender 2003).
4.3. Maximal
Syllable
Given the evidence above concerning the
obstruent-approximant CC sequences, the most common maximal syllable attested in
Northern Mao is CCVC, apart from the very rare example of CCVNC. This latter
example may be parsed as follows:
(26)
|
σ
|
σ
|
σ
|
|
|
/\
|
/\
|
/\
|
|
|
O
|
R
|
O
|
R
|
O
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
|
\
|
/
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
V
|
C
|
C
|
V
|
N
|
C
|
C
|
V
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h
|
a.
|
k’
|
w
|
i
|
n
|
s.
|
k
|
a
|
/ha.k’wins.ka
/ MLH ‘kneel’
|
5. Tonal
Melodies
Northern Mao, like other Omotic languages, exhibits
contrastive tone. Wedekind and Wedekind (1993:12) report the existence of two
distinctive pitch levels in two-syllable words: H and L (with an allotonic M),
though no discussion of the allotonic M tone is provided. Four tonal melodies
are reported for two syllable words but discussion is lacking as to tonal
melodies on words of more than two syllables. Baye 2006 also reports the
existence of the H and L tones.
5.1. Three Levels of
Tone
First, it is helpful to establish the levels of tone which
appear to be contrastive. Contrary to Wedekind and Wedekind and Baye’s
findings, current research suggests there are three levels of tone in Northern
Mao. Consider the following words, which are distinguishable only by
melody:
(27)
|
[6 6]
|
|
|
[3 3]
|
|
|
[1 1]
|
|
|
|
/kawe
/ HH‘hanging thing’
|
/kawe
/ MM ‘bamboo mat’
|
/kawe
/ LL ‘top;
upwards’
[18]
|
Lexeme
|
Tone
|
Gloss
|
Mean F0 for each syllable (from 3 tokens) |
Mean Vowel Length (from 3 tokens) |
/kawe
/
|
HH
|
‘hanging thing’
|
160 /166 Hz
|
110 ms
|
/kawe
/
|
MM
|
‘bamboo mat’
|
146 /146 Hz
|
96 ms
|
/kawe
/
|
LL
|
‘top; upwards’
|
120 /120 Hz
|
92 ms
|
Table 14: Measurements for 3 Levels of
Tone
There is a large set of nouns for each of the three level melodies.
Table 14 provides the fundamental frequency measurements and mean vowel lengths
based on three utterances of each word. The three examples in (27) are
controlled for vowel length, demonstrating that each features a short vowel, as
well as the same syllable pattern and part of speech. That is, only tonal melody
distinguishes these otherwise identical nouns. Each of these words is well
within the typical length range for short vowels, as discussed above.
5.2. Surface Melodies of Nouns
Arranged by Syllable Type
Of course, as is expected of languages with three levels of
tone, a variety of possible melodies is found on words. In the discussion below,
the melodies of words of various syllable patterns are inventoried. Tone
melodies are inventoried by syllable type to show contrast relative to syllable
patterns. Tonal phenomena, apart from contrastive tone, are beyond the scope of
this analysis and will be dealt with in a later work.
With these three levels of tone, seven (of the nine
possible) melodies may be found for two-syllable nouns. There are three level
melodies, two rising melodies and two falling melodies. The two melodies not
attested are HM and LM; the M tone is limited in distribution in the second
syllable, following only M:
|
H
|
M
|
L
|
H
|
HH
|
|
HL
|
M
|
MH
|
MM
|
ML
|
L
|
LH
|
|
LL
|
Table 15: Melody Inventory of Two-Syllable
Nouns
Thus, before a H tone or a L tone, each of the three levels
is clearly contrastive, as may be observed on the [ka] syllable in each of the
following words: /kawe/ HH ‘hanging thing’; /kane/ MH ‘dog’; /kawe/ LH ‘arm’; /kale/ HL ‘corral’; /kawe/ MM ‘bamboo mat’; /kame/ ML
‘fire’; /kawe/ LL ‘top; upwards’.
The tables below provide evidence of the full seven-melody inventory,
arranged by CV pattern. While it has been well established that so-called
depressor consonants may interact with tone systems in African languages (Hyman
and Mathangwane 1998; Pearce 1998; Kutsch Lojenga 2000), the phenomenon is not
observed in Northern Mao. Regardless of consonants involved, the full set of
expected melodies is attested. Table 16 provides the full set of melodies for
the most common short vowel syllable shapes.
|
HH
|
LL
|
HL
|
LH
|
MM
|
MH
|
ML
|
CV.CV
|
/k’ets’e
/‘floor’ |
/kese
/ ‘swelling’ |
/koŋe
/ ‘collecting grain’ |
/k’ane
/ ‘arrangement’ |
/kute
/ ‘skin’ |
/kane
/ ‘dog’ |
/keze
/ ‘top’ |
CVC.CV
|
/golge/ ‘throat’ |
/wets’k’e/ ‘earthworm’ |
/talk’e/ ‘headpad’ |
/belge/ ‘star’ |
/p’erk’e/ ‘flash of
lightning’
|
/moske/ ‘semen’ |
/t’ulk’e/ ‘pit/stone (of
fruit)’
|
CVN.CV
|
/dambe/ ‘tradition;
culture’
|
/ponse/ ‘mouth’ |
/k’onts’e/ ‘comb (of
rooster)’
|
/ʃaŋk’e/ ‘leopard’ |
/ent’e/ ‘male’ |
/ints’e/ ‘fear’ |
/konts’e/ ‘face’ |
CCV.CV
|
/kwap’e/ ‘wing’ |
/kwaʃe/ ‘bridge’ |
/pjats’e/ ‘plaster’ |
/twage/ ‘bushbuck; deer’ |
/ʃwot’e/ ‘antelope’ |
/k’wine/ ‘wiping excrement’ |
/k’wile/ ‘a small squash’ |
Table 16: Tonal Melodies of the Common Short Vowel
Shapes
Syllables with nasal codas have not been found to impact
surface tonal melodies (as seen in Table 16); thus, from this point forward,
nasal codas will be specified only in those positions which are limited to
nasals in the Northern Mao database.
Table 17 provides examples of the most common two-syllable CV shapes
with long vowels. As noted in the section on syllable structure above,
two-syllable nouns with long vowels exhibit the same seven melodies as
two-syllable nouns with short
vowels.
[19]
As noted above, M tone
is found on the final vowel only when following a M tone.
|
HH
|
LL
|
HL
|
LH
|
MM
|
MH
|
ML
|
CVV.CV
|
/puːre
/ ‘apply lotion’ |
/puːre
/ ‘flour’ |
/peːʃe
/ ‘slap’ |
/p’aːle
/ ‘digging tool’ |
/paːle
/ ‘heavy thing’ |
/seːme
/ ‘finding’ |
/ʃaːme
/ ‘collard greens’ |
CVVC.CV
|
/ts’aːlde/ ‘bone marrow’ |
/geːnde/ ‘rainbow’ |
/saːnts’e/ ‘bed’ |
/diːlde/ ‘blessing’
|
/kiːnts’e/ ‘snot’
|
/suːnts’e/ ‘waist’ |
/maːlte/ ‘fat’ |
CCVV.CV
|
/ʃweːme/
[20]
‘shin’
|
/ʃwiːle/ ‘canoe’ |
/gjaːje/ ‘many’ |
/swiːre/ ‘hawk’ |
/gjaːre/ ‘peace’ |
/kwaːŋe/ ‘shield’ |
/kwaːŋe/ ‘descendent’ |
Table 17: Tonal Melodies of the Common Long Vowel
Shapes
While additional CV patterns are attested for two-syllable nouns
(provided in Table 18, below), these are far less frequent than the others. In
each instance, the data are too few to attest a full set of the seven melodies
found in the tables above. However, it should be noted that there are no
additional melodies attested in words with these syllable patterns; gaps in the
melodic inventory are assumed to be accidental.
Table 18: Tonal Melodies of Rare Two-Syllable
Shapes
Three-syllable nouns are less common than two-syllable nouns in Northern
Mao and they exhibit a wider variety of surface melodies; a full 12 different
surface melodies have been attested in the set of 146 three-syllable nouns:
three level melodies (HHH, MMM, LLL), three melodies where the pitch rises
across the word (LHH, LLH, MHH), three melodies where the pitch falls (HLL, HHL,
MLL), two melodies where the pitch rises and then falls (LHL, MHL) and one
melody where the pitch falls and then rises (HLH). Important generalizations
regarding this melodic inventory include 1) the lack of MML and MMH melodies, a
notable absence while both LLH and HHL are found and 2) the only melody attested
with all three pitch levels present is MHL. Thus, the M tone is lacking in some
distributions where we do find H and L attested, just as was the case with the
two-syllable nouns.
Unlike the two-syllable nouns, there is no single syllable pattern of
three-syllable words which exhibits all twelve of the melodies attested. Thus,
the number of tokens of each melody by syllable type is provided in Table 19 and
an example of each is provided in Appendix D. The syllable patterns are arranged
by frequency of occurrence in the database.
Syllable Pattern
|
HHH
|
LLL
|
HHL
|
HLL
|
HLH
|
LHH
|
LLH
|
LHL
|
MMM
|
MHH
|
MHL
|
MLL
|
Total
|
CV.CV.CV
|
8
|
7
|
2
|
12
|
|
17
|
|
23
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
83
|
CVC.CV.CV
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
7
|
7
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
7
|
39
|
CV.CVV.CV
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
CV.CVC.CV
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
5
|
CCV.CV.CV
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
5
|
CVV.CV.CV
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
3
|
CVC.CVV.CV
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
CCVN.CV.CV
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
Table 19: Surface Melodies of Three-Syllable Nouns by
Shape
It is not possible at this point to say with any certainty
that the gaps in Table 19 are ‘accidental’. It is, however, assumed
that this is the case—that these gaps are due to the overall small
inventory of tri-syllabic words. It is admitted, though, that these gaps may be
due to tonal phenomena which have yet to be discovered.
Only seven examples of four-syllable nouns have been found. No clear
indication of borrowing or internal morphology is present in these
examples.
Table 20: Tonal Melodies of Four Syllable
Nouns
5.3. Tonal Melodies of Verbs
in Citation Form
The citation form of the verb is marked with the declarative
/ha-/prefix and the perfective /-a/ suffix. There are three tonal melodies
found on verbs in this citation form, regardless of syllable pattern: MHM, MMH,
MLH, where the initial M corresponds to the declarative prefix. These melodies
then allow for roots with a surface H, M or L tone. The tone of the suffix is H
underlyingly; the M tone is the result of a downstep due to a floating
root-final L tone. A few examples of verbs in their citation form, their surface
melody and the surface melodies of corresponding nominal
forms
[21]
are provided in Table 21,
below.
Citation Verb
|
Tone
|
Gloss
|
Citation Noun
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
Modified Noun Melody
|
/hakasa/
|
MMH
|
‘cook’
|
/kase/
|
HH
|
‘cooking’
|
MM
|
/hakowa/
|
MLH
|
‘sit’
|
/kowe/
|
HH
|
‘sitting’
|
LL
|
/hakeːwa/
|
MHM
|
‘wound’
|
/keːwe/
|
MM
|
‘a bruise, wound’
|
ML
|
/hakesa/
|
MHM
|
‘swell’
|
/kese/
|
LL
|
‘swelling’
|
ML
|
/hakola/
|
MMH
|
‘speak’
|
/kole/
|
HL
|
‘speech’
|
ML
|
/hakura/
|
MLH
|
‘smoke meat’
|
/kure/
|
HL
|
‘smoking meat’
|
LL
|
/hak’ofa/
|
MLH
|
‘cut’
|
/k’ofe/
|
LH
|
‘cutting’
|
LL
|
/hakuʃa/
|
MHM
|
‘wash’
|
/kuʃe/
|
MH
|
‘washing’
|
ML
|
/hakjamba/
|
MHM
|
‘hunt’
|
/kjambe/
|
ML
|
‘hunting’
|
ML
|
Table 21: Tonal Mapping Between Verbs and
Nouns
It is clear here that there is not a simple relationship
between the surface melodies of verbs and nouns in these data. The following
generalizations, however, may be drawn: 1) nouns with the melodies HH and HL
relate to verbs with either MMH or MLH melodies 2) nouns with the melodies LL,
MM, ML, and MH relate only to verbs with the melody MHM; 3) nouns with the
melody LH correspond to the verbal melody MLH 4) the verbal melody MMH is found
in correspondence with nominal melodies HH and HL and with nothing else. This is
unlike the other two melodies found with the set HH and HL; they may be found in
verbs with MLH melodies. These generalizations are represented in Table 22,
below.
Nominal Melodies
|
|
Verbal Melodies
|
HH, HL
|
------
|
MMH, MLH
|
MM, MH, ML, LL
|
------
|
MHM
|
LH
|
------
|
MLH
|
Table 22: Melodic Correspondences Between Nouns and
Verbs
Thus, nouns with HH citation melodies may correspond to
either of two different verbal melodies. The same is true of HL citation melody
nouns. This splitting of the HH and HL melody classes is attested in various
subsystems and must be the result of historical processes which have given rise
to the tone classes today.
The final column of Table 21 provides the melody of the nominal form
when it is modified (i.e. by another noun, a relative clause, etc.). The seven
melodies found on nouns in citation form collapse into three melodies when the
noun is modified: MM, ML and LL. The modifying noun maintains its citation
melody. While this sort of phenomena involving both syntax and morphology is
beyond the scope of this phonological study, it warrants mentioning on the
grounds that it further supports the notion that nouns with the citation melody
HH may be split into two classes, those which become MM (H1) and those which
become LL (H2), when modified. These two classes relate to the verbal melodies
perfectly: H1 nouns exhibit MM modifying melodies and MMH verbal melodies; H2
nouns exhibit LL modifying melodies and MLH verbal melodies. This same division
into classes can be undertaken for the HL nouns: HL1 nouns exhibit ML modifying
melodies and MMH verbal melodies; HL2 nouns exhibit LL modifying melodies and
MLH verbal melodies. There are nine tone classes, one for each nominal citation
melody, and an additional class for each of the HH and HL citation melodies, as
observed in both the verbal citation form and the modified noun melody.
A further examination of tonal phenomena requires syntactic and
morphological input that is beyond the scope of this paper, which focuses on
contrastive elements within the phonological system as well as constraints
within the phonological word. These phenomena as well as hypotheses as to the
genesis of the tone classes will be discussed in later work.
6. Conclusions and Future
Work
The discussion above shows that in addition to consonants
and vowels, contrastive phenomena in Northern Mao also include both vowel-length
and tone. Each of the five vowels in the system exhibits a long counterpart
which apart from length, patterns in other ways as the short vowels: they carry
only the same inventory of single level tones as do short vowels and they fit
within the same syllable patterns. Three heights of contrastive tone are
exhibited, but no contour tones in monosyllabic words are
found.
[22]
Two types of harmony systems are attested: 1) sibilant and 2) vocalic.
The sibilant harmony system in Northern Mao is less complex, due to its smaller
inventory of sibilants, than in many other Omotic languages (Hayward 1988),
though it is still clear that the phenomenon operates as both a root constraint
as well as harmony across morpheme boundaries. The vocalic harmony system is one
of backness, where root vowels must agree without regard to height. The vowel
/a/, which is a low-central vowel, does not participate in the harmony system
and may co-occur in either front or back roots, as may the post-thematic vowel
/-e/, which is found on the citation form of all nouns.
The data provided in this paper were gathered in the field from
September 2007 to April 2009. This research project will result in analysis of
the tonal system of nouns and verbs, morphology, syntax and a variety of
discourse phenomena. A 3,000 entry tri-glot glossary (Northern Mao, Amharic and
English) has been compiled, along with a collection of proverbs and a corpus of
30 fully interlinearized texts.
References
Azeb Amha. 2001. The Maale language
. Leiden: Research School
CNWS, Leiden University.
Beachy, Marvin Dean. 2005. An overview of Central Dizin phonology
and morphology. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. University of Texas at
Arlington.
Baye Yimam. 2006. A general description of Mao. ELRC Working Papers
II/2:166-225.
Bender, M. Lionel. 1975. The beginnings of ethnohistory in western
Wellegga: the Mao problem. Patterns in Language, Culture and Society:
Sub-Saharan Africa. OSU Working Papers in
Linguistics
19: 125-141.
Bender, M. Lionel. 1985. Gumuz, Koman, Mao and Omotic. Studies in
African Linguistics (supplement) 9:19-21.
Bender, M. Lionel. 1990. The limits of Omotic. Omotic Language
Studies, ed. by Richard J. Hayward. School of Oriental and African Studies,
University of London.
Bender, M. Lionel. 2000. Comparative morphology of the Omotic
languages. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
Bender, M. Lionel. 2003. Omotic lexicon and phonology. (Published
by author.)
Fleming, Harold C. 1986. Mao’s ancestor: consonant phonemes
of proto-Mao stage one. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of
Ethiopian Studies 5:26-29.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1970. Some generalizations concerning
glottalic consonants, especially implosives. International Journal of American
Linguistics 36:123-145. doi:10.1086/465105
Grottanelli, Vinigi. 1940. I Mao. Centro studi per l’Africa
orientale Italiana; missione etnografica nel Uollega occidentale, vol. 1. Rome:
Reale Accademia d’Italia.
Hayward, Dick. 1988. Remarks on Omotic sibilants. Papers from the
International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Cologne, January 6-9,
ed. by Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst and Fritz Serzisko, 263-299. Hamburg: Helmut
Buske Verlag.
Hayward, Richard J. 2000. The ‘empty quarter’ of
Afroasiatic. Research in Afroasiatic grammar II: Selected papers from the Fifth
Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, 241-61.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hyman, Larry M. and Joyce T. Mathangwane. 1998. Tonal Domains and
Depressor Consonants in Ikalanga. Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Tone, ed. by
Larry M. Hyman and Charles W. Kisseberth. Stanford: CSLI 195-229.
Kutsch Lojenga, Constance 2000. Depressor Consonants in African
Languages. Paper presented at Tone Symposium, Tromsö, Norway, June 5-7.
Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to
the Sounds of Languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Pearce, Mary. 1998. Consonants and tone in Kera (Chadic). Journal
of West African Languages 27/1.33-70.
Rapold, Christian. 2006. Towards a grammar of Benchnon. Unpublished
Ph.D. Dissertation. The Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Leiden
University.
Siebert, Kati, Ralph Siebert and Klaus Wedekind. 1993. Survey on
languages of the Asosa-Begi-Komosha area. S.L.L.E. Linguistic Report no. 11.
Addis Ababa: Institute of Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa University.
Siebert, Ralph, Charlotte Wedekind and Klaus Wedekind. 1994. Third
S.L.L.E. survey on languages of the Begi/Asosa area. S.L.L.E. Linguistic Report
no. 15. Addis Ababa: Institute of Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa University.
Wedekind, Charlotte and Klaus Wedekind. 1993. Survey on languages
of the Asosa Begi-Komosha area part II. S.L.L.E. Linguistic Report no. 12.
Addis Ababa: Institute of Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa
University.
Michael Ahland
University of Oregon
mahland@uoregon.edu
michael_ahland@sil.org
Appendix A
Evidence for Consonant
Contrast
p : b
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/pake/
|
HL
|
‘injera’
|
/bake/
|
ML
|
‘name of
bird-species’
|
/pule/
|
HL
|
‘rolling
something’
|
/buts’e/
|
HL
|
‘feast’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/k’ope/
|
HL
|
‘road’
|
/obe/
|
HL
|
‘brother’
|
p : p’
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/paːle/
|
MM
|
‘heavy /difficult
thing’
|
/p’aːle/
|
LH
|
‘digging tool’
|
/poːne/
|
HH
|
‘going out’
|
/p’owe/
|
HH
|
‘crossing’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hupe/
|
MH
|
‘brooding (of a
hen)’
|
/up’e/
|
HL
|
‘termite mound’
|
p’ : f
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/p’owe/
|
HH
|
‘crossing’
|
/puwe/
|
HH
|
‘traditional beer’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/kup’e/
|
HL
|
‘hat’
|
/kupe/
|
ML
|
‘granary’
|
b : m
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/beːze/
|
HL
|
‘broom handle’
|
/meːze/
|
HH
|
‘wise’
|
/buts’e/
|
HL
|
‘feast’
|
/muts’e/
|
LH
|
‘name of a Mao admin.
area’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/iːbe/
|
LH
|
‘visitor’
|
/iːme/
|
LH
|
‘cattle’
|
t : d
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/tuge/
|
HH
|
‘foot; name’
|
/duge/
|
HL
|
‘house pole’
|
/tige/
|
LL
|
‘beer-brewing
basket’
|
/dike/
|
LH
|
‘scratching’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hawuta/
|
MLH
|
‘he cried out’
|
/hauda/[ha
ʔuda]
|
MHM
|
‘pile in a heap’
|
t : t’
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/tjame/~[tamɛ]
|
HH
|
‘counting’
|
/t’ame/
|
LH
|
‘tasting’
|
/teːne/
|
MM
|
‘chest’
|
/t’eːnt’e/
|
ML
|
‘worm’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
(there is no /t’/intervocalically, only
/ɗ/, as noted above)
|
/kute/
|
MM
|
‘skin’
|
/kut’e/
|
HL
|
‘spine’
|
in CC sequence
|
|
|
|
/maːlte/
|
ML
|
‘fat’
|
/maːlt’e/
|
ML
|
‘bone’
|
g : k
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/gite/
|
HL
|
‘head-covering’
|
/ki-te/
|
ML
|
‘came-REL’
|
/gaːne/
|
LL
|
‘riches’
|
/kane/
|
MH
|
‘dog’
|
/gome/
|
HH
|
‘cleared land’
|
/kowe/
|
HH
|
‘sitting’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hagaʃa/
|
MLH
|
‘burp’
|
/hakaʃa/
|
MHM
|
‘shut’
|
in initial CC sequence
|
|
|
|
|
/gjaːje/
|
HL
|
‘many’
|
/kjambe/
|
ML
|
‘hunting’
|
/gwiːnt’e/
|
LH
|
‘sweeping’
|
/kwiːnt’e/
|
HH
|
‘hair’
|
k : k’
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/kane/
|
MH
|
‘dog’
|
/k’ane/
|
LH
|
‘arrangement’
|
/kuse/
|
HH
|
‘hand’
|
/k’ets’e/
|
HH
|
‘floor’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃike/
|
MM
|
‘knife’
|
/ʃik’e/
|
MH
|
‘fart’
|
m : n
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/maːre/
|
MM
|
‘grass’
|
/naːre/
|
HH
|
‘brideprice’
|
/maʃe/
|
LL
|
‘beer brewing’
|
/naʃe/
|
LH
|
‘this’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/iːme/
|
LH
|
‘cattle’
|
/ine/
|
HH
|
‘doing’
|
n : ŋ
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the velar nasal does not appear
word-initially)
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ine/
|
HH
|
‘doing’
|
/eːŋe/
|
MM
|
‘heart’
|
/koːne/
|
MH
|
‘jealousy’
|
/koŋe/
|
HL
|
‘collecting grain after
harvest’
|
s : ʃ
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/seːpe/
|
LH
|
‘sword’
|
/ʃeːme/
|
ML
|
‘crab (fresh
water)’
|
/soge/
|
MH
|
‘limping’
|
/ʃoŋe/
|
ML
|
‘krar’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/meːse/
|
HH
|
‘harvest’
|
/meːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘shaman’
|
s : z
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/soge/
|
MH
|
‘limping’
|
/zume/
|
HH
|
‘song of praise’
|
/seːme/
|
MH
|
‘finding’
|
/zep’e/
|
LL
|
‘together’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hasoga/
|
MHM
|
‘limp’
|
/hazoga/
|
MLH
|
‘follow along a
river/treeline’
|
s : ts’
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/soge/
|
MH
|
‘limping’
|
/ts’oge/
|
MH
|
‘collecting’
|
/seːre/
|
HH
|
‘law’
|
/ts’ere/
|
HL
|
‘cutting bamboo’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hasoga/
|
MHM
|
‘he limped’
|
/hats’oga/
|
MHM
|
‘he gathered’
|
in CC sequence
|
|
|
|
|
|
/iːnse/
|
HL
|
‘wood’
|
/ints’e/
|
MH
|
‘fear’
|
r : d
|
|
|
|
|
|
(/r/does not appear word-initially, except in
borrowed words)
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ure/
|
HL
|
‘hump’
|
/ude/
|
ML
|
‘heap’
|
/are/
|
HH
|
‘nipple’
|
/ade/
|
ML
|
‘sister’
|
/mare/
|
LL
|
‘grabbing’
|
/amaːde/
|
LLL
|
‘in-laws’
|
r : l
|
|
|
|
|
|
(/r/is not found word-initially; / L/is found
initially in only a single word)
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/arime/
|
LHL
|
‘rotten thing’
|
/alime/
|
LHL
|
‘turban’
|
/tuːre/
|
MH
|
‘pushing’
|
/tuːle/
|
MH
|
‘pounding’
|
w : b
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/wit’e/
|
HL
|
‘calabash’
|
/bite/
|
LH
|
‘honey-mead’
|
/weze/
|
LL
|
‘crazy, mad’
|
/beːze/
|
HL
|
‘broom handle’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/keːwe/
|
MM
|
‘wound’
|
/ʃebe/
|
HH
|
‘loitering’
|
w : m
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/weze/
|
LL
|
‘crazy, mad’
|
/meːze/
|
HH
|
‘wisdom,
skillfulness’
|
/wame/
|
HH
|
‘river’
|
/maːme/
|
LL
|
‘carrying a child’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/keːwe/
|
MM
|
‘wound’
|
/keme/
|
LH
|
‘growing’
|
w : j
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/joːse/
|
MH
|
‘song’
|
/woːse/
|
MH
|
‘what?’ (response to
question)
|
/jeːse/
|
HH
|
‘stew’
|
/weze/
|
LL
|
‘crazy; mad’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/aːje/
|
LH
|
‘father’
|
/aːwe/
|
LH
|
‘grasshopper’
|
in CC sequence
|
|
|
|
|
|
/gjaːre/
|
ML
|
‘peace’
|
/gwaːne/
|
LH
|
‘pray, request (of
God)’
|
j : ʃ
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/jeːre/
|
LH
|
‘baby’
|
/ʃeːre/
|
MH
|
‘soup’ or ‘fresh,
hot’
|
/jeːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘honey’
|
/ʃeːʃe/
|
MM
|
‘urine’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hawiːja/
|
MMH
|
‘say’
|
/hawiːʃa/
|
MHM
|
‘return’
|
# : h
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
/aːts’e/
|
LL
|
‘tooth’
|
/haːts’e/
|
ML
|
‘water’
|
/eːge/
|
HL
|
‘scorpion’
|
/hek’e/
|
MH
|
‘death’
|
intervocalic
|
|
|
|
|
|
/haup’a/[ha
ʔup’a]
|
MMH
|
‘bury’
|
/hahup’a/
|
MHM
|
‘steal’
|
Appendix B
Evidence for Vowel
Contrast
i : e
|
|
|
|
|
|
/int’e/
|
HH
|
‘seeing’
|
/ent’e/
|
MM
|
‘male’
|
/ts’ik’e/
|
LH
|
‘white clay’
|
/ts’ek’e/
|
HH
|
‘fermenting beer’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
|
/iːme/
|
LH
|
‘cattle’
|
/eːme/
|
LH
|
‘touching
(something)’
|
i : u
|
|
|
|
|
|
/tile/
|
MH
|
‘stomach’
|
/tule/
|
HL
|
‘being used to
smoking’
|
/ki-te/
|
HL
|
‘came-REL’
|
/kute/
|
MM
|
‘skin’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
|
/piːre/
|
HH
|
‘tasting of meat by
elders’
|
/puːre/
|
HH
|
‘applying lotion’
|
e : a
|
|
|
|
|
|
/hets’e/
|
HL
|
‘flattening grass’
|
/hats’e/
|
HL
|
‘tomorrow’
|
/kese/
|
LL
|
‘swelling’
|
/kase/
|
LL
|
‘pouring into another’s
mouth’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃeːme/
|
ML
|
‘crab (fresh
water)’
|
/ʃaːme/
|
ML
|
‘collard greens’
|
e : o
|
|
|
|
|
|
/kose/
|
MH
|
‘breath’
|
/kese/
|
LL
|
‘swelling’
|
/k’ope/
|
HL
|
‘road’
|
/k’ele/
|
MM
|
‘body’
|
/bet’e/
|
LH
|
‘salt’
|
/bot’e/
|
ML
|
‘groin’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
|
/k’oːts’e/
|
MH
|
‘standing something
up’
|
/k’eːts’e/
|
MH
|
‘flower; being lit,
aflame’
|
u : o
|
|
|
|
|
|
/t’uʃe/
|
LL
|
‘strapping’
|
/t’oʃe/
|
HH
|
‘sprouting’
|
/puwe/
|
HH
|
‘traditional beer’
|
/powe/
|
LL
|
‘anus’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃuːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘spitting’
|
/ʃoːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘snake’
|
o : a
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃowe/
|
HL
|
‘stone’
|
/ʃawe/
|
HL
|
‘sand’
|
/pole/
|
MM
|
‘outside’
|
/pale/
|
LL
|
‘Thompson’s
Gazelle’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
|
/soːnts’e/
|
ML
|
‘child’
|
/saːnts’e/
|
HL
|
‘bed’
|
e : u
|
|
|
|
|
|
/bet’e/
|
LH
|
‘salt’
|
/but’e/
|
LH
|
‘shyness or fear (of
person)’
|
/gese/
|
ML
|
‘friend’
|
/gute/
|
HL
|
‘crown (of
rooster)’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
/t’eːnt’e/
|
ML
|
‘worm (general)’
|
/t’uːnt’e/
|
ML
|
‘bait; fishing
worm’
|
o : i
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃowe/
|
HL
|
‘stone’
|
/ʃiwe/
|
MM
|
‘wind’
|
/k’ope/
|
LH
|
‘cutting’
|
/k’ipe/
|
LH
|
‘covering a pot (for
cooking)’
|
long vowels
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃoːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘snake’
|
/ʃiːʃe/
|
ML
|
‘name of tree’
|
Appendix C
Vowel Formant
Data
i
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0 Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [i]
Hz
|
F2 [i]
Hz
|
/ʃike/
|
MM
|
‘knife’
|
69
|
146
|
103
|
148
|
418
|
2200
|
/ʃik’e/
|
MH
|
‘fart’
|
60
|
162
|
106
|
196
|
341
|
2204
|
/wit’e/
|
HL
|
‘calabash’
|
69
|
191
|
126
|
133
|
411
|
1419
|
/bite/
|
LH
|
‘honey-mead’
|
80
|
138
|
123
|
175
|
360
|
2153
|
/ints’e/
|
MH
|
‘fear’
|
89
|
140
|
75
|
159
|
422
|
1951
|
/ine/
|
HH
|
‘doing’
|
94
|
184
|
113
|
196
|
384
|
2175
|
/gite/
|
HL
|
‘head-covering’
|
85
|
171
|
97
|
133
|
358
|
2335
|
/tige/
|
LL
|
‘beer-brewing
basket’
|
60
|
132
|
108
|
128
|
382
|
2222
|
/dike/
|
LH
|
‘scratching’
|
69
|
129
|
99
|
169
|
370
|
2327
|
/k’ipe/~
[k’ifɛ]
|
LH
|
‘covering pot (for
cooking)’
|
83
|
138
|
96
|
189
|
434
|
2099
|
Totals
|
|
|
758
|
|
1046
|
|
3880
|
21085
|
Means
|
|
|
76
|
|
105
|
|
388
|
2109
|
e
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [ɛ]
Hz
|
F2 [ɛ]
Hz
|
/ts’ere/
|
HL
|
‘cutting bamboo’
|
113
|
158
|
86
|
121
|
639
|
1729
|
/hek’e/
|
MH
|
‘death’
|
96
|
142
|
73
|
159
|
573
|
1823
|
/k’ele/
|
MM
|
‘body’
|
92
|
152
|
117
|
157
|
558
|
1560
|
/keme/
|
LH
|
‘growing’
|
93
|
129
|
102
|
169
|
516
|
2043
|
/weze/
|
LL
|
‘crazy, mad’
|
72
|
128
|
90
|
133
|
517
|
1842
|
/ʃebe/
|
HH
|
‘loitering’
|
96
|
201
|
100
|
197
|
597
|
1983
|
/zep’je/
|
LL
|
‘together’
|
96
|
126
|
92
|
124
|
502
|
2005
|
/k’ets’e/
|
HH
|
‘floor’
|
112
|
177
|
79
|
177
|
546
|
1827
|
/keze/
|
ML
|
‘top’
|
105
|
128
|
83
|
103
|
458
|
2006
|
/kese/
|
LL
|
‘swelling’
|
95
|
127
|
86
|
127
|
480
|
1824
|
Totals
|
|
|
970
|
|
908
|
|
5386
|
18642
|
Means
|
|
|
97
|
|
91
|
|
539
|
1864
|
u
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [u]
Hz
|
F2 [u]
Hz
|
/puwe/∼[fuwe]
|
HH
|
‘traditional beer’
|
80
|
181
|
81
|
192
|
460
|
853
|
/kup’e/
|
HL
|
‘hat’
|
76
|
189
|
95
|
113
|
389
|
759
|
/kufe/
|
ML
|
‘granary’
|
61
|
159
|
70
|
128
|
478
|
821
|
/hupe/∼[hufe]
|
MH
|
‘brooding (of a hen)’
|
85
|
169
|
111
|
190
|
424
|
857
|
/buts’e/
|
HL
|
‘feast’
|
100
|
182
|
91
|
119
|
393
|
982
|
/pule/
|
HL
|
‘rolling
something’
|
96
|
170
|
88
|
134
|
447
|
926
|
/dure/
|
ML
|
‘year’
|
104
|
135
|
140
|
117
|
376
|
1217
|
/tuge/
|
HH
|
‘foot; name’
|
67
|
193
|
101
|
204
|
402
|
999
|
/ude/
|
ML
|
‘heap’
|
104
|
149
|
74
|
127
|
435
|
907
|
/ure/
|
HL
|
‘hump’
|
106
|
182
|
86
|
114
|
387
|
933
|
Totals
|
|
|
879
|
|
937
|
|
4191
|
9254
|
Means
|
|
|
88
|
|
94
|
|
419
|
925
|
o
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [o]
Hz
|
F2 [o]
Hz
|
/ts’oge/
|
MH
|
‘collecting’
|
97
|
149
|
123
|
172
|
497
|
1325
|
/soge/
|
MH
|
‘limping’
|
63
|
147
|
121
|
160
|
486
|
1195
|
/ʃoŋe/
|
ML
|
‘krar’
|
104
|
155
|
105
|
125
|
621
|
1385
|
/koŋe/
|
HL
|
‘collecting grain after
harvest’
|
95
|
174
|
91
|
116
|
591
|
1218
|
/gome/
|
HH
|
‘cleared land’
|
114
|
154
|
117
|
152
|
541
|
1113
|
/p’owe/
|
HH
|
‘crossing’
|
77
|
193
|
95
|
204
|
587
|
975
|
/obe/
|
HL
|
‘brother’
|
98
|
189
|
79
|
128
|
566
|
966
|
/k’ope/∼[k’ofe]
|
HL
|
‘road’
|
63
|
178
|
91
|
129
|
552
|
1094
|
/ʃowe/
|
HL
|
‘stone’
|
104
|
171
|
92
|
120
|
531
|
1133
|
/k’ope/∼[k’ofe]
|
LH
|
‘cutting’
|
97
|
134
|
116
|
171
|
537
|
959
|
Totals
|
|
|
912
|
|
1030
|
|
5509
|
11363
|
Means
|
|
|
91
|
|
103
|
|
551
|
1136
|
a
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [a]
Hz
|
F2 [a]
Hz
|
/pake/
|
HL
|
‘injera’
|
92
|
162
|
66
|
114
|
719
|
1619
|
/bake/
|
ML
|
‘name of
bird-species’
|
81
|
136
|
71
|
112
|
671
|
1650
|
/wame/
|
HH
|
‘river’
|
73
|
166
|
93
|
165
|
733
|
1405
|
/ase/
|
MM
|
‘hail’
|
109
|
148
|
129
|
146
|
701
|
1639
|
/mare/
|
LL
|
‘grabbing’
|
71
|
118
|
102
|
119
|
787
|
1671
|
/are/
|
HH
|
‘nipple’
|
99
|
185
|
188
|
195
|
791
|
1684
|
/maʃe/
|
LL
|
‘beer brewing’
|
96
|
127
|
85
|
131
|
765
|
1676
|
/naʃe/
|
LH
|
‘this’
|
79
|
129
|
96
|
173
|
745
|
1686
|
/kane/
|
MH
|
‘dog’
|
87
|
176
|
78
|
202
|
744
|
1761
|
/k’ane/
|
LH
|
‘arrangement’
|
101
|
133
|
105
|
177
|
754
|
1650
|
Totals
|
|
|
888
|
|
1013
|
|
7410
|
16441
|
Means
|
|
|
89
|
|
101
|
|
741
|
1644
|
iː
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [iː]
Hz
|
F2 [iː]
Hz
|
/iːbe/
|
LH
|
‘visitor’
|
145
|
131
|
104
|
162
|
387
|
2317
|
/iːme/
|
LH
|
‘cattle’
|
132
|
133
|
101
|
168
|
400
|
2276
|
/iːnse/
|
HL
|
‘wood’
|
139
|
146
|
76
|
100
|
399
|
2217
|
/gwiːnt’e/
|
LH
|
‘sweeping (cleaning mud
off)’
|
119
|
127
|
88
|
169
|
387
|
2260
|
/miːme/
|
HH
|
‘mosquito’
|
157
|
145
|
106
|
145
|
337
|
2189
|
/miːnts’e/
|
LL
|
‘cutting; intestines /guts’
|
127
|
118
|
78
|
125
|
368
|
2197
|
/ʃiːnt’e/
|
HH
|
‘nose’
|
132
|
145
|
112
|
153
|
458
|
2158
|
/piːre/∼[fiːre]
|
HH
|
‘tasting of meat by
elders’
|
189
|
165
|
143
|
169
|
353
|
1290
|
/ʃiːʃe/
|
ML
|
‘name of tree’
|
168
|
144
|
87
|
113
|
308
|
2303
|
/iːnt’e/
|
HL
|
‘grunt’
|
216
|
172
|
107
|
126
|
335
|
2306
|
Totals
|
|
|
1524
|
|
1002
|
|
3732
|
21513
|
Means
|
|
|
152
|
|
100
|
|
373
|
2151
|
eː
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [eː]
Hz
|
F2 [eː]
Hz
|
/beːze/
|
HL
|
‘broom handle’
|
179
|
159
|
120
|
118
|
506
|
2042
|
/teːne/
|
MM
|
‘chest’
|
208
|
130
|
106
|
125
|
626
|
2033
|
/t’eːnt’e/
|
ML
|
‘worm’
|
166
|
135
|
84
|
111
|
673
|
1954
|
/seːre/
|
HH
|
‘law’
|
203
|
155
|
156
|
165
|
618
|
1918
|
/eːge/
|
HL
|
‘scorpion’
|
166
|
153
|
110
|
109
|
607
|
1850
|
/seːpe/∼[seːfe]
|
LH
|
‘sword’
|
144
|
145
|
135
|
184
|
583
|
1997
|
/ʃeːre /
|
MH
|
‘soup’ or ‘fresh, hot’
|
205
|
155
|
146
|
176
|
487
|
2003
|
/jeːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘honey’
|
185
|
160
|
136
|
170
|
482
|
2062
|
/meːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘shaman’
|
177
|
160
|
156
|
166
|
523
|
2025
|
/jeːse/
|
HH
|
‘stew’
|
182
|
162
|
139
|
169
|
481
|
2010
|
Totals
|
|
|
1815
|
|
1288
|
|
5586
|
19894
|
Means
|
|
|
182
|
|
129
|
|
559
|
1989
|
uː
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [uː]
Hz
|
F2 [uː]
Hz
|
/tuːre/
|
MH
|
‘pushing’
|
191
|
168
|
164
|
191
|
375
|
1020
|
/puːre/∼[fuːre]
|
HH
|
‘applying lotion’
|
204
|
196
|
173
|
200
|
408
|
979
|
/ʃuːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘spitting’
|
169
|
209
|
150
|
210
|
430
|
1063
|
/t’uːnt’e/
|
ML
|
‘bait; fishing
worm’
|
193
|
172
|
124
|
135
|
376
|
1031
|
/kuːme/
|
LL
|
‘bamboo fish trap’
|
179
|
130
|
137
|
121
|
408
|
796
|
/t’uːʃe/
|
HH
|
‘meeting’
|
180
|
202
|
148
|
201
|
420
|
1016
|
/duːle/
|
LH
|
‘hyena’
|
183
|
119
|
132
|
150
|
372
|
968
|
/puːre/∼[fuːre]
|
LL
|
‘flour’
|
187
|
121
|
128
|
119
|
415
|
970
|
/suːnts’e/
|
MH
|
‘back’
|
197
|
146
|
119
|
164
|
450
|
1136
|
/kuːle/
|
MM
|
‘middle, central part’
|
176
|
158
|
127
|
162
|
393
|
830
|
Totals
|
|
|
1859
|
|
1402
|
|
4047
|
9809
|
Means
|
|
|
186
|
|
140
|
|
405
|
981
|
oː
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [oː]
Hz
|
F2 [oː]
Hz
|
/joːse/
|
MH
|
‘song’
|
136
|
169
|
128
|
185
|
520
|
1140
|
/koːne/
|
MH
|
‘jealousy’
|
173
|
159
|
126
|
182
|
504
|
976
|
/goːme/
|
ML
|
‘thinking’
|
190
|
129
|
116
|
108
|
418
|
900
|
/koːle/
|
MM
|
‘cliff’
|
176
|
173
|
116
|
170
|
518
|
999
|
/joːʃe/
|
ML
|
‘rainy season’
|
143
|
155
|
87
|
128
|
471
|
959
|
/toːke/
|
ML
|
‘head’
|
174
|
125
|
120
|
110
|
468
|
1002
|
/hoːre/
|
LL
|
‘tribe; ethnic
group’
|
189
|
122
|
147
|
123
|
490
|
971
|
/hoːt’e/
|
HH
|
‘sound; voice;
yelling’
|
160
|
181
|
155
|
185
|
515
|
1019
|
/poːne/
|
HH
|
‘going out’
|
155
|
195
|
116
|
210
|
604
|
1164
|
/soːnts’e/
|
ML
|
‘child’
|
156
|
146
|
83
|
117
|
606
|
1135
|
Totals
|
|
|
1652
|
|
1078
|
|
5114
|
10265
|
Means
|
|
|
165
|
|
108
|
|
511
|
1027
|
aː
Lexeme
|
Melody
|
Gloss
|
V1
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
V2
ms
|
F0
Hz
|
F1 [aː]
Hz
|
F2 [aː]
Hz
|
/gaːne/
|
LL
|
‘riches’
|
193
|
117
|
91
|
111
|
698
|
1616
|
/aːts’e/
|
LL
|
‘tooth’
|
176
|
121
|
94
|
117
|
811
|
1555
|
/haːts’e/
|
ML
|
‘water’
|
169
|
134
|
78
|
105
|
788
|
1581
|
/maːre/
|
MM
|
‘grass’
|
184
|
137
|
133
|
141
|
579
|
1520
|
/maːlt’e/
|
ML
|
‘bone’
|
148
|
145
|
93
|
121
|
826
|
1495
|
/maːlte/
|
ML
|
‘fat’
|
140
|
128
|
79
|
112
|
758
|
1550
|
/paːle/∼[paːle]
|
MM
|
‘heavy thing’
|
167
|
143
|
77
|
143
|
825
|
1549
|
/p’aːle/
|
LH
|
‘digging tool’
|
180
|
108
|
100
|
147
|
856
|
1636
|
/aːke/
|
HL
|
‘phlegm’
|
185
|
167
|
108
|
115
|
832
|
1573
|
/aːts’e/
|
LL
|
‘language’ (homophone with
‘tooth’)
|
157
|
124
|
101
|
117
|
849
|
1599
|
Totals
|
|
|
1699
|
|
954
|
|
7822
|
15674
|
Means
|
|
|
170
|
|
95
|
|
782
|
1567
|
Appendix D
Tonal Melodies of
Three-Syllable Nouns
Syllable Pattern
|
HHH
|
LLL
|
HHL
|
HLL
|
HLH
|
LHH
|
LLH
|
LHL
|
MMM
|
MHH
|
MHL
|
MLL
|
CV.CV.CV
|
/gobole/ ‘window’
|
/taŋets’e/ ‘giraffe’
|
/iliʃe/ ‘cooking
pot’
|
/kuʃume/‘chin’
|
|
/dabare/‘turn’
|
|
/hakake/ ‘cheek’
|
/uʃume/‘navel’
|
/ʃap’ile/‘armpit’ |
/jeniʃe/ ‘Berta’ |
/kit’iʃe / ‘neck’
|
CVC.CV.CV
|
/gombole/ ‘mortar (pounding
pot)’
|
/gergeʃe/ ‘wall’ |
/mamsese/ ‘fair’
|
/tulkume/ ‘knee’ |
/nakneja/‘brother’ |
|
/ʃindit’e/ ‘pimple’ |
|
/waŋgile/‘jackal’ |
|
/nogdowe/‘lion’
|
/k’embile/‘loincloth’
|
CV.CVV.CV
|
|
/amaːde/ ‘relative by
marriage’
|
|
|
/koloːle/‘malaria’ |
|
|
/asaːne/‘plate’ |
|
|
|
|
CV.CVC.CV
|
|
|
/mamisje/ ‘truth’ |
|
|
|
/awande/ ‘neighbor’
|
/agunde/‘tooth-brush
stick’
|
|
|
/adurke/‘white foreigner’ |
|
CCV.CV.CV
|
/k’wak’ile/ ‘skin (of fruit)’ |
|
|
/k’wek’iʃe/‘turtle; tortoise’ |
|
|
|
/k’wagire/‘thorn tree’ |
|
|
/ʃwalike/‘partridge’
|
|
CVV.CV.CV
|
/jaːrkeŋe/ ‘5
th month;
January’
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/kaːʃaje/‘baboon’ |
|
|
|
/maːgawe/‘friend’ |
CVC.CVV.CV
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ʃundoːre/‘donkey’ |
|
/bismaːre/‘nail’ |
|
|
|
|
CCVN.CV.CV
|
/kwaŋgile/ ‘fishhook’
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/twaŋgile/‘elephant’
|
[1]
This research is partly
funded through a grant from the National Science Foundation, "Doctoral
Dissertation Research: A Grammar and Interlinearized Texts of Northern Mao, an
Understudied Omotic Language," under the direction of Dr. Doris Payne,
University of Oregon. This work would not be possible without the support of the
Benishangul-Gumuz Culture Office in Asosa and the help and support of the Mao
community in Bambassi and Diddesa, especially Ato Yasin Ibrahim, Ato Mamo
Shimagele, Ato Muletu Mesoba and Ato Tefera Ibrahim. The author is also indebted
to the scholars at the Department of Linguistics at Addis Ababa University, who
have helped to make this work possible, offering advice and
support—especially Professor Baye Yimam and Drs. Hirut Woldemariam and
Moges Yigezu.
[2]
H, M and L notations
indicate high, mid and low tones, respectively. These are the only levels which
are contrastive in Northern Mao and typically are the only levels found at the
level of the ‘word’. Within long phrases and clauses, additional
levels are detectable but are due to processes which are beyond the scope of
this paper. These phenomena will be dealt with in a later paper focusing on
tonal phenomena in Northern Mao.
[3]
It should also be
mentioned in this discussion of sounds which have been reported for Northern
Mao, that while Fleming reconstructs *mb as a prenasalized stop for the Mao
languages, (Fleming 1986:39) there is no evidence for prenasalization in
Northern Mao (i.e. no nasal-obstruent sequences occur word-initially).
[4]
When speakers have been
questioned about any of these three sounds, the response is that different
speakers will use different pronunciations [p], [f] or
[ɸ]. In some cases, however, speakers will
produce all three variants in the same word in different utterances.
[5]
There are minimal pairs
which show the difference in behavior between the glottal stop and glottal
fricative: /ham- aːts’e/ [ham-] 1PL +
[ʔaːtsɛ]
‘
tooth/language’ > [hamaːts’ɛ]
MML ‘our language’ and /ham-haːts’e/[ham-] 1PL +
[haːtsɛ]
‘water’ > [hamhaːts’ɛ]
MML ‘our water’. While the glottal stop is not present in the
environment of another onset, the /h/is maintained.
[6]
Out of the 3,000
entries in the database, only 61 instances of
[ɗ] are found in comparison to 322 instances
of [t’].
[7]
There is a
co-occurrence restriction which results in the loss of the initial [h] in the
declarative prefix when the verb root begins with an [h].
[8]
This citation form,
while morphologically complex, is the form preferred by the author’s
Northern Mao consultants when making reference to a verb in conversation or in
isolated elicitation. The infinitive form, which is fully nominal and exhibits a
tonal melody different from finite verbs (these melodies correspond to the tone
class system exhibited by other nominals) as well as the nominal post-thematic
vowel /-e/, is actually the least complex form but serves as a nominal rather
than verbal form in syntactic function.
[9]
It is important to
note that root-final consonants on nominals become word-final in connected
speech, where the final /-e/vowel of nominals is generally lost.
[10]
The relative clause
markers /-te/and /-ese/, affirmative and negative, respectively, each carry a
final low tone, which can be clearly observed in the citation form of a headless
relative construction. When the relative clause is modifying a noun, however,
the final vowel (the tone bearing unit) of the relative clause marker is lost
(as is the case with the final vowel of all nominals), and its final L tone is
in some cases (H and M tones may be downstepped while L tones merge with
floating L’s and do not exhibit a downstep) preserved by causing downstep
on the following noun, here indicated by ↓. The specifics related to this
phenomena will be discussed in another paper detailing the results of a phonetic
study of downstep phenomena, which has been co-written with Dr. Mary Pearce,
University College London and SIL International and will be presented at the
World Congress of African Linguistics (WOCAL 6) in August 2009.
[11]
Here, markedness is
used in the sense that palatal sibilants may be considered less common (as
opposed to alveolar sibilants) in the world’s languages.
[12]
Of course, since
nouns end in /-e/, only the non-final vowels were measured.
[13]
The vowel of the
verb root ‘come’ is reduced to the [j] approximant in the perfective
form and its H tone combines with the M tone of the final perfective suffix to
form a H-M fall; this is an irregularity, and no other verb exhibits such
behavior.
[14]
Among the speakers
consulted, loanwords do not conform to any harmony specifications.
[15]
In addition to the
two CVNC forms provided in Table 9, there is also the single occurrence of a
CCVNC pattern, as seen in
/ha.k’wins.ka/ MLH ‘kneel’. Additionally, there is a variant of
/am.p’i.ts’e/ LLL ‘bead’
, which is pronounced
as [ʔamp’.ts’ɛ]
LL—without the epenthetic vowel [i].
[16]
Of course, when the
final vowels of nominals are dropped in connected speech (as discussed above in
3.2), complex codas become far more common. Also, the noun-noun associative and
noun-noun compound constructions involve nouns which are phonologically bound
and where the non-final nouns do not carry their post-thematic /-e/ vowel. This
greatly complicates the consonant clusters in Northern Mao. This present
examination of phonotactics is limited to monomorphemic words, as noted
above.
[17]
Rapold is able to
argue convincingly for an alternative analysis concerning the labialized
consonants, where an alternative variant pronunciation C[uj] is analyzed as an
underlying form (2006:100). No such phenomenon has been observed in Northern
Mao.
[18]
Additional minimal
and near-minimal pairs involving these same consonants include /kaːwe/ HH ‘white thing’, /kawe/ LH ‘arm’ and /kaːwe/ LL ‘griddle’.
[19]
While it may be
expected that phonetic contours would exist when a long vowel with H tone
precedes a syllable carrying low tone, this is not the case. There are, in fact,
no contour tones in monomorphemic words.
[20]
A variant
pronunciation of this word does not exhibit the [w] approximant:
[ʃeːme].
[21]
These verbal nouns
are considered nominal due to their overlapping syntactic distribution with more
prototypical nouns. For instance, the verbal nouns can be modified by other
nouns in common noun-noun constructions. Additionally, they tend to occur in
highly integrated, nominalized modality (same-subject) complements, some
purposive constructions as well as deverbal nominalizations (agentive and
instrumental, for example).
[22]
Contours may be
found in polymorphemic words as in /ha-ta-a/ DECL-give-RL MLH ‘give’, where the root vowel and the realis
morpheme /-a/ H form a geminate /aː/ with a
rising L-H contour.
|